<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2022-11-01T11:00:00+10:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2005" />
  <endPage num="2075" />
  <dateModified time="2023-07-06T08:42:16+09:30" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Local Government Amalgamations</name>
      <text id="20221101a3f43255ee90473f80000617">
        <heading>Local Government Amalgamations</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="6888" referenceid="1b23b655d40349f8a472b7b9eeba16df" kind="question">
        <name>Mr TELFER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Flinders</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2022-11-01T00:30:00+10:30">
            <name>Local Government Amalgamations</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2022-11-01T14:48:47+10:30" />
        <text id="20221101a3f43255ee90473f80000618">
          <timeStamp time="2022-11-01T14:48:47+10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="6888" referenceid="1b23b655d40349f8a472b7b9eeba16df">Mr TELFER (Flinders) (14:48):</by>  Thank you for getting there, Mr Speaker. My question is to the Minister for Local Government. Minister, what is the government's final position on what constitutes a positive response to the City of Mount Gambier and District Council of Grant amalgamation plebiscite? With your leave, sir, and that of the house, I will explain.</text>
        <text id="20221101a3f43255ee90473f80000619">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="6888" referenceid="1b23b655d40349f8a472b7b9eeba16df" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>Mr TELFER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Flinders</electorate>
        <text id="20221101a3f43255ee90473f80000620">
          <by role="member" id="6888" referenceid="1b23b655d40349f8a472b7b9eeba16df">Mr TELFER:</by>  In parliament, the minister repeated:</text>
        <text id="20221101a3f43255ee90473f80000621">
          <inserted>The government will carefully consider the results of the plebiscite. It will consider how voters across both councils voted, how voters in each council voted and, in the case of the District Council of Grant, how voters in each of the three wards voted.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20221101a3f43255ee90473f80000622">Subsequent to that statement, the minister has said in the media that a result will be the cumulative of the two councils.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5084" referenceid="5e4189c3f09746759e26a644a9e66bcf" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. P.B. MALINAUSKAS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Croydon</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2022-11-01T14:49:34+10:30" />
        <text id="20221101a3f43255ee90473f80000623">
          <timeStamp time="2022-11-01T14:49:34+10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="5084" referenceid="5e4189c3f09746759e26a644a9e66bcf">The Hon. P.B. MALINAUSKAS (Croydon—Premier) (14:49):</by>  I thank the local member for the question, because it is a legitimate one and one that I believe is going to become increasingly topical in the days ahead as we find out the outcome of the plebiscite.</text>
        <page num="2043" />
        <text id="20221101a3f43255ee90473f80000624">I had the fantastic opportunity to be down in Mount Gambier on Friday of last week. I think that, from memory, it is something like the fifth time I have been in Mount Gambier this year. I have committed to the people of the Limestone Coast to make sure that I have a frequent presence for as long as I have the privilege of holding the office that I currently do.</text>
        <text id="20221101a3f43255ee90473f80000625">The Limestone Coast is full of potential, and apart from Mount Gambier being our second biggest city in South Australia there is a great chance to enhance not just the prosperity of the local community but the state more broadly, which is why we have taken an active interest and why we have made over $100 million worth of commitments. It is also transparently available to the people of South Australia to pursue in the lead-up to the election and it is also accounted for in the budget.</text>
        <text id="20221101a3f43255ee90473f80000626">With respect to our interest, though, it goes beyond just the election commitments. It is an ongoing interest about maximising opportunity where we can find it, and that includes facilitating a really historic moment by providing every ratepayer in the Grant district council area and the Mount Gambier city council area the opportunity to have a say through a direct vote about whether or not they want to simply examine council amalgamation. To go to the specifics of the minister's question—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="6888" referenceid="1b23b655d40349f8a472b7b9eeba16df" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Telfer</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Flinders</electorate>
        <text id="20221101a3f43255ee90473f80000627">
          <by role="member" id="6888" referenceid="1b23b655d40349f8a472b7b9eeba16df">Mr Telfer:</by>  I'm only the shadow, sir.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5084" referenceid="5e4189c3f09746759e26a644a9e66bcf" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. P.B. MALINAUSKAS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Croydon</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <text id="20221101a3f43255ee90473f80000628">
          <by role="member" id="5084" referenceid="5e4189c3f09746759e26a644a9e66bcf">The Hon. P.B. MALINAUSKAS:</by>  Sorry, the shadow minister's question. My apologies. We have been very clear about this, as has the Minister for Local Government, that there is going to be a ballot. We will fully release the outcome of that ballot, and the yes/no vote will be broken down in the Mount Gambier council area, and then separately we will release what the yes/no ballot outcome is in the Grant district council area. As the member mentioned in his question, there will also be a breakdown of the vote in the respective wards.</text>
        <text id="20221101a3f43255ee90473f80000629">In terms of what constitutes a yes or a no vote in the pursuit of the examination, it is the total vote. The total vote will determine whether or not there is the examination. What is important for the shadow minister to be aware of, and indeed everyone casting a ballot if they haven't done so already, is what will transpire in the event of a yes vote.</text>
        <text id="20221101a3f43255ee90473f80000630">In the event that there is a yes vote there will be an examination done through the Local Government Boundaries Commission in conjunction most likely with the Productivity Commission, and then separately to that but concurrently with that we will also undertake a broad ranging and wide community consultation throughout the Grant district council area and the City of Mount Gambier. We don't know what the outcome of those two separate exercises will be. They are sincere and they are genuine in wanting to explore what the potential benefits of amalgamation are and what the potential costs of amalgamation are so that everyone can fully digest that and assess it.</text>
        <text id="20221101a3f43255ee90473f80000631">However, here is the simple view that the government has: why not ask the question? We've got to have the courage to ask the question, and if we ask the question of those that this decision will be affected by the most and they come back and say, 'No, we don't even want to examine it,' then so be it, no harm done. But, of course, if they do want the examination to take place we will actively facilitate that as a government.</text>
        <text id="20221101a3f43255ee90473f80000632">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20221101a3f43255ee90473f80000633">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Order!</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>