<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="4.0" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2022-09-08T11:00:00+09:30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1499" />
  <endPage num="1568" />
  <dateModified time="2022-10-26T11:41:13+10:30" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Personal Explanation</name>
    <text id="20220908459b49b3fc624f9290000191">
      <heading>Personal Explanation</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Member's Remarks</name>
      <text id="20220908459b49b3fc624f9290000192">
        <heading>Member's Remarks</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5381" referenceid="a67795d8a9734f88b14c11a0318b3b0c" kind="speech">
        <name>Mr TEAGUE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Heysen</electorate>
        <startTime time="2022-09-08T12:27:20+09:30" />
        <text id="20220908459b49b3fc624f9290000193">
          <timeStamp time="2022-09-08T12:27:20+09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="5381" referenceid="a67795d8a9734f88b14c11a0318b3b0c">Mr TEAGUE (Heysen) (12:27):</by>  By leave, I seek to make a personal explanation pursuant to standing order 108.</text>
        <text id="20220908459b49b3fc624f9290000194">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Deputy Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20220908459b49b3fc624f9290000195">
          <by role="office">The DEPUTY SPEAKER:</by>  You are limited to what you can say, you understand that, if you have been misrepresented in some way.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5381" referenceid="a67795d8a9734f88b14c11a0318b3b0c" kind="speech" continued="true">
        <name>Mr TEAGUE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20220908459b49b3fc624f9290000196">
          <by role="member" id="5381" referenceid="a67795d8a9734f88b14c11a0318b3b0c">Mr TEAGUE:</by>  Leave has just been granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Deputy Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20220908459b49b3fc624f9290000197">
          <by role="office">The DEPUTY SPEAKER:</by>  That is correct: leave has been granted. It is also not an opportunity to redebate the whole proposal. Member, the floor is yours.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5381" referenceid="a67795d8a9734f88b14c11a0318b3b0c" kind="speech" continued="true">
        <name>Mr TEAGUE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20220908459b49b3fc624f9290000198">
          <by role="member" id="5381" referenceid="a67795d8a9734f88b14c11a0318b3b0c">Mr TEAGUE:</by>  Yes. In remarks just now, the substance and sentiments of which I largely wholly endorse, the minister made reference—and I would not otherwise bring up the particulars—to briefings that were afforded or otherwise to members on this side of the chamber. As far as I am concerned, it is important that I put on the record that the briefing that I was offered in my relevant portfolio capacity in relation to the plebiscite bill was a briefing that was provided to me and attended by me along with the member for Flinders and some staff. It was a briefing that I appreciate the opportunity to have been given.</text>
        <text id="20220908459b49b3fc624f9290000199">It was at 3.30pm on Tuesday 6 September, earlier this week, and it afforded me at least that opportunity to engage in some dialogue in relation to the scope and purpose or otherwise of the plebiscite bill. It is important that I make clear on the record that at no time was the opportunity afforded, nor did I informally take it up, to engage in a dialogue or otherwise in relation to this bill, which is unsurprising because it is wholly outside my current shadow portfolio responsibilities. That is by way of further context to the remarks, providing general context to the way in which this bill has come before us today.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>