<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2022-07-05" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="857" />
  <endPage num="932" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Sports Funding</name>
      <text id="202207050467c8ebdd2844be90000607">
        <heading>Sports Funding</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4840" kind="question">
        <name>Mr TARZIA</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Hartley</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2022-07-05">
            <name>Sports Funding</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2022-07-05T14:57:25" />
        <text id="202207050467c8ebdd2844be90000608">
          <timeStamp time="2022-07-05T14:57:25" />
          <by role="member" id="4840">Mr TARZIA (Hartley) (14:57):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Recreation, Sport and Racing. Are either or both the local sporting club grants, totalling $3 million to the West Adelaide Hellas Junior and Kilburn West Adelaide soccer clubs, to be used to complete the Kilburn Sportsplex on Churchill Road, Kilburn, which received $4.8 million in grants under the former Labor government but has remained unfinished?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Lee</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2022-07-05">
            <name>Sports Funding</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2022-07-05T14:57:50" />
        <text id="202207050467c8ebdd2844be90000609">
          <timeStamp time="2022-07-05T14:57:50" />
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN (Lee—Treasurer) (14:57):</by>  As I said in my earlier remarks, these funds are to be used to improve those facilities.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4840" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Tarzia</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="202207050467c8ebdd2844be90000610">
          <by role="member" id="4840">Mr Tarzia:</by>  What for?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="202207050467c8ebdd2844be90000611">
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN:</by>  Well, he interjects, 'What for?' This is now the fifth time, and the member seems to think that I am referring to a PBN. Actually, the documents I have in front of me—and I'm happy to leave them here—are the details of the grants that were approved by the previous Liberal government around two of their grassroots sporting grants.</text>
        <text id="202207050467c8ebdd2844be90000612">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="202207050467c8ebdd2844be90000613">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER</by>:  Order! Member for Hartley! Member for Colton! The Treasurer has the call.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="202207050467c8ebdd2844be90000614">
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN:</by>  Those opposite say that Rec and Sport independently assess those, and it makes me wonder why 12 of the 13 grants awarded went exclusively to Liberal electorates and one went to an Independent electorate. Well done! Keep digging! Try digging up!</text>
        <text id="202207050467c8ebdd2844be90000615">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="202207050467c8ebdd2844be90000616">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER</by>:  Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="202207050467c8ebdd2844be90000617">
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN:</by>  If you want openness and transparency, take your decisions to the people, to the community before an election, and ask them to cast their judgement—</text>
        <text id="202207050467c8ebdd2844be90000618">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="202207050467c8ebdd2844be90000619">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Member for Flinders! Member for Morphett!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="896" />
        <text id="202207050467c8ebdd2844be90000620">
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN:</by>  —exactly as we did, and now they cast their judgement we deliver our election commitments. Because we are not rehabilitating an asbestos and sulphur-ridden contaminated dump facility, like those opposite committed at the election, because we are actually upgrading sporting and community clubs that people actually use, we have been criticised for it. Is there any wonder they are over there?</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>