<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2022-05-31" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="407" />
  <endPage num="481" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Grievance Debate</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Mobile Phone Towers</name>
      <text id="20220531dea4b2268b7b4d6f80000672">
        <heading>Mobile Phone Towers</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="6895" kind="speech">
        <name>Ms HOOD</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Adelaide</electorate>
        <startTime time="2022-05-31T15:28:30" />
        <page num="452" />
        <text id="20220531dea4b2268b7b4d6f80000673">
          <timeStamp time="2022-05-31T15:28:30" />
          <by role="member" id="6895">Ms HOOD (Adelaide) (15:28):</by>  I firmly believe the residential streets in our community should be known for their leafy green boulevards and character homes, not twin mobile phone towers, but that is exactly what telco giant Optus has been trying to construct in Prospect's south-east. Last year, along with a number of my neighbours, I launched a community campaign to prevent a second 30-metre mobile phone tower from being erected near locals' homes.</text>
        <text id="20220531dea4b2268b7b4d6f80000674">Early in 2021, Optus lodged plans for the 30-metre tower to be constructed in the car park of Crowies Paints in College Avenue, Prospect. The proposed location of the tower is immediately adjacent to a residential zone, causing maximum impact to the residential neighbourhood. In fact, the proposed tower would be built directly up against the fence of another couple's home and just 72 metres from the existing 30-metre Telstra mobile phone tower in Ballville Avenue. </text>
        <text id="20220531dea4b2268b7b4d6f80000675">To put that in context, I am quite confident that I could kick a football from one mobile phone tower to the next if this mobile phone tower were constructed—and I am no Barrie Robran! Locals believe that it does not past pass the fairness test to allow a second 30-metre mobile phone tower to be erected near their homes, arguing that it would significantly damage the general amenity and character of our neighbourhood.</text>
        <text id="20220531dea4b2268b7b4d6f80000676">A petition launched late last year attracted 200 signatures in a matter of days. We have letterboxed and knocked on doors and held a protest, the latter being covered by 7 News. I would like to thank my neighbours Karen and Enzo Pepe and David Lloyd, and many others, for their hard work on this campaign and also acknowledge the Mayor of Prospect, David O'Loughlin and many of its councillors, in particular Alison DeBacker and Kristina Barnett, for their support of our campaign.</text>
        <text id="20220531dea4b2268b7b4d6f80000677">While our community had an initial win in September last year, with the City of Prospect's council assessment panel calling on Optus to provide further information on its application, the telco giant continues to progress its plans for the mobile phone tower at the College Avenue site. Our community campaign has consistently called for an investigation into alternative locations for the second 30-metre mobile phone tower, saying that a concerted effort should be undertaken to find a more suitable site, not directly adjacent a residential area, that minimises the impact on local residents and the suburb as a whole.</text>
        <text id="20220531dea4b2268b7b4d6f80000678">Residents understand there is a need for telecommunications infrastructure, but the science should not be given the green light simply because Optus and the landowner are in agreement. Optus has deep pockets and resources to undertake a proper investigation into a more suitable location along Main North Road that minimises the impact on local homes. We encourage members of the community to join in our campaign against the construction of this twin phone tower.</text>
        <text id="20220531dea4b2268b7b4d6f80000679">The community has until midnight tomorrow (Wednesday night) to make a submission. You can go to the PlanSA website at www.plansa.gov.au and search for the application number 22010588. We acknowledge that it is a David and Goliath battle and, while we may not be a telco giant, we are a strong and connected neighbourhood and we have people power.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>