<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2022-05-17" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="187" />
  <endPage num="253" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>North-South Corridor</name>
      <text id="20220517302e278fb8f34ad6b0000475">
        <heading>North-South Corridor</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4840" kind="question">
        <name>Mr TARZIA</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Hartley</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2022-05-17">
            <name>North-South Corridor</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2022-05-17T14:54:44" />
        <text id="20220517302e278fb8f34ad6b0000476">
          <timeStamp time="2022-05-17T14:54:44" />
          <by role="member" id="4840">Mr TARZIA (Hartley) (14:54):</by>  Supplementary to that, again to the minister: will the minister then release any details and modelling on the cost of any productivity losses as a consequence of any of these delays that he is referring to?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">West Torrens</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Infrastructure and Transport</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Energy and Mining</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2022-05-17">
            <name>North-South Corridor</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2022-05-17T14:54:58" />
        <text id="20220517302e278fb8f34ad6b0000477">
          <timeStamp time="2022-05-17T14:54:58" />
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS (West Torrens—Minister for Infrastructure and Transport, Minister for Energy and Mining) (14:54):</by>  I didn't mention any delays: I said that we were conducting a review.</text>
        <text id="20220517302e278fb8f34ad6b0000478">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20220517302e278fb8f34ad6b0000479">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  Well, a new time line could be—</text>
        <text id="20220517302e278fb8f34ad6b0000480">
          <event kind="interjection">An honourable member interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20220517302e278fb8f34ad6b0000481">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  As my learned friend says, it could accelerate some parts of the project.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Deputy Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20220517302e278fb8f34ad6b0000482">
          <by role="office">The DEPUTY SPEAKER:</by>  Could the Minister for Human Services and the member for Chaffey—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20220517302e278fb8f34ad6b0000483">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  I have to say that the agitation of members opposite coming from these leaks is getting pretty pronounced now. There is a certain level of agitation going on.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. Mullighan</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20220517302e278fb8f34ad6b0000484">
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. Mullighan:</by>  It’s set the hares running.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20220517302e278fb8f34ad6b0000485">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  It has set the hares running. Who could possibly leak such information? But there have been no such leaks from our cabinet. Our cabinet is watertight—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. Mullighan</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="223" />
        <text id="20220517302e278fb8f34ad6b0000486">
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. Mullighan:</by>  That's right, united.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20220517302e278fb8f34ad6b0000487">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  Watertight and united. There are no individuals. We are a team. There is no-one out there trying to promote themselves.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Deputy Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20220517302e278fb8f34ad6b0000488">
          <by role="office">The DEPUTY SPEAKER:</by>  There is a point of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343">
        <name>Mr GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20220517302e278fb8f34ad6b0000489">
          <by role="member" id="4343">Mr GARDNER:</by>  Standing order 98.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Deputy Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20220517302e278fb8f34ad6b0000490">
          <by role="office">The DEPUTY SPEAKER:</by>  Has the minister concluded his response?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20220517302e278fb8f34ad6b0000491">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  I have lots more to talk about this leak. I reject the inference of the question that there will be delays. I reject the inference of the question. What I have said is that members opposite propose to have some suburbs living in the shade while they are building tunnels, and we are looking at those overpasses to make sure we get them right.</text>
        <text id="20220517302e278fb8f34ad6b0000492">That doesn't mean delays. What it means is that we are doing a job properly, and for members opposite, who have not put a shovel in the ground, to be attempting to criticise us, I think, quite frankly, is dishonest of them. Why don't they just accept nothing happened—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Deputy Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20220517302e278fb8f34ad6b0000493">
          <by role="office">The DEPUTY SPEAKER:</by>  There is a point of order, minister.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343">
        <name>Mr GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20220517302e278fb8f34ad6b0000494">
          <by role="member" id="4343">Mr GARDNER:</by>  That is clearly in contravention of standing order 98.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Deputy Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20220517302e278fb8f34ad6b0000495">
          <by role="office">The DEPUTY SPEAKER:</by>  I think the minister has probably answered the question.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>