House of Assembly Fifty-Fifth Parliament Parliament, First Session (55-1) 55 1 Parliament of South Australia House of Assembly published Question Time Majors Road Upgrade Majors Road Upgrade Mr SPEIRS House of Assembly Black Leader of the Opposition Majors Road Upgrade Mr SPEIRS (Black—Leader of the Opposition) (14:30): My supplementary question is to the Premier. Given that he is unaware of advice from the Department for Infrastructure and Transport that traffic might be increased on Brighton Road, will he commission— The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS House of Assembly The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS: Point of order: the opposition leader is inserting facts into his question. He can't do that, so, sir, I ask that you rule that question out of order and ask him to rephrase. The Deputy Speaker House of Assembly The DEPUTY SPEAKER: I uphold the point of order. I will give the leader a chance to rephrase the question or move on to another question. Mr SPEIRS House of Assembly Mr SPEIRS: Thank you for your patience, Mr Deputy Speaker. My supplementary question is to the Premier. Will the Premier commission advice with regard to potential increases in traffic flows along Brighton Road as a consequence of the development of an on/off ramp for the Southern Expressway at Majors Road? The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS House of Assembly West Torrens Minister for Infrastructure and Transport Minister for Energy and Mining The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS (West Torrens—Minister for Infrastructure and Transport, Minister for Energy and Mining) (14:31): The former government did commission a report into the Majors Road on/off ramp, and they received that in February of 2020. Their report concluded that there would be a reduction in overall travel distances for a reasonably significant number of trips but that that would not certainly justify the cost, and the government then abandoned the project. That was in February 2020. But that didn't deter one young ambitious minister. He kept on fighting for this. He kept on fighting for this project. He didn't capitulate. Oh, no, he fought on. He fought on because on 13 July of that same year, after having received that report— Mr GARDNER House of Assembly Mr GARDNER: Point of order. The Deputy Speaker House of Assembly The DEPUTY SPEAKER: There is a point of order. The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS House of Assembly The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS: —he still supported the project. The Deputy Speaker House of Assembly The DEPUTY SPEAKER: There is a point of order. Mr GARDNER House of Assembly Mr GARDNER: Debate. The Deputy Speaker House of Assembly The DEPUTY SPEAKER: Does the Minister for Infrastructure and Transport have anything else to add? The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS House of Assembly The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS: I have plenty to add, sir. The Deputy Speaker House of Assembly The DEPUTY SPEAKER: Can you also ensure that it's closer to the question. The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS House of Assembly The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS: I am, sir. I think the premise of the argument made by the Leader of the Opposition is that his government received a report that didn't justify this expenditure; therefore, why are we. He received that report in February 2020. I just gave the house an explanation about why the former government didn't proceed. What I am saying is that didn't stop a young ambitious minister fighting for his community, because in July of that same year, after having received that report, what was he doing? He was still fighting for that interchange. He wouldn't capitulate. River Murray, capitulate? Yes. Majors Road, capitulate? No. The Hon. C.J. Picton House of Assembly The Hon. C.J. Picton: Who are you talking about? The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS House of Assembly The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS: I'm talking about the Leader of the Opposition, the member for Black. Mr TARZIA House of Assembly Mr TARZIA: Point of order: this is debate, 98. The Deputy Speaker House of Assembly The DEPUTY SPEAKER: The member for Gibson.