<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2022-05-05" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fifth Parliament Parliament, First Session (55-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>55</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="121" />
  <endPage num="186" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Brompton Gasworks</name>
      <text id="2022050595f92d31626c47d5b0000514">
        <heading>Brompton Gasworks</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5381" kind="question">
        <name>Mr TEAGUE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Heysen</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2022-05-05">
            <name>Brompton Gasworks</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2022-05-05T14:50:27" />
        <text id="2022050595f92d31626c47d5b0000515">
          <timeStamp time="2022-05-05T14:50:27" />
          <by role="member" id="5381">Mr TEAGUE (Heysen) (14:50):</by>  My question is to the Premier. Will the Premier accept that he was wrong to question before the election Renewal SA's selection of the preferred proponent on the grounds of a lack of open space when MAB Corporation's proposal includes about 25 per cent more open space than the former Labor government's revised master plan for the development of the site?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="6889" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. N.D. CHAMPION</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Taylor</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Trade and Investment</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2022-05-05">
            <name>Brompton Gasworks</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2022-05-05T14:50:50" />
        <text id="2022050595f92d31626c47d5b0000516">
          <timeStamp time="2022-05-05T14:50:50" />
          <by role="member" id="6889">The Hon. N.D. CHAMPION (Taylor—Minister for Trade and Investment, Minister for Housing and Urban Development, Minister for Planning) (14:50):</by>  Open space is just one of the criteria that we should be looking at with this site. We also need to look at remediation. I would invite members opposite to have a very good look at remediation. It's probably the most polluted industrial site in South Australia. All of that is on the public record. You can google it; in fact, I invite members to do so. It is a very seriously polluted site. Open space is an issue and economic benefit is an issue. All of these things will be considered by the review which we will receive and then make appropriate decisions from there.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>