<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2021-11-17" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="8322" />
  <endPage num="8685" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Answers to Questions</name>
    <subject>
      <name>South Road Upgrade</name>
      <text id="20211117f253771a263c4ddfb0001494">
        <inserted>
          <heading>South Road Upgrade</heading>
        </inserted>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5376" kind="question">
        <name>Ms STINSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Badcoe</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2021-10-15" qonNum="860">
            <name>South Road Upgrade</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20211117f253771a263c4ddfb0001495">
          <inserted>860 <by role="member" id="5376">Ms STINSON (Badcoe)</by> (15 October 2021).  With regards to the South Road upgrade works and land acquisition up-front payment:</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20211117f253771a263c4ddfb0001496">
          <inserted>(a)&amp;#x9;Can people who are having their homes acquired, spend the $10,000 upfront cash payment on 'whatever they want'?</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20211117f253771a263c4ddfb0001497">
          <inserted>(b)&amp;#x9;If not, why are they being told this by DIT officials in one-on-one meetings?</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4843" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. C.L. WINGARD</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Gibson</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Infrastructure and Transport</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Recreation</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2021-10-15" qonNum="860">
            <name>South Road Upgrade</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20211117f253771a263c4ddfb0001498">
          <inserted>
            <by role="member" id="4843">The Hon. C.L. WINGARD (Gibson—Minister for Infrastructure and Transport, Minister for Recreation, Sport and Racing):</by>  I have been advised:</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20211117f253771a263c4ddfb0001499">
          <inserted>Section 26B of the Land Acquisition Act 1969 states the authority may pay an owner of land (owner of the fee simple in the land in relation to which a notice of intention to acquire is given) an amount not exceeding $10,000 towards payment of legal and valuation costs.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20211117f253771a263c4ddfb0001500">
          <inserted>If an owner has been paid the $10,000 towards professional fees and the professional fees exceed $10,000, then all fees being claimed will need to be appropriately assessed in line with the government's policy that they must be reasonable costs that arise naturally, reasonably and directly from the acquisition and are incurred in seeking professional advice on a person's entitlement to compensation (with legal costs reimbursed will be in accordance with the Higher Courts Costs Scale, previously the Supreme Court Scale) as this position is consistent with the scheme and case law and valuation fees must be at the prevailing market rate, all as stipulated in the Legal and Valuation Fact Sheet.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20211117f253771a263c4ddfb0001501">
          <inserted>There may be situations whereby an owner does not spend the entirety of the $10,000 on legal and valuation fees. In this scenario it is usually not in the authority's interest to initiate recovery action for any unspent funds that the party having their property acquired may have been able to save on professional fees.</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>