<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2021-11-16" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="8220" />
  <endPage num="8587" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Landscape Boards</name>
      <page num="8268" />
      <text id="20211116726991d7ef264d3580000952">
        <heading>Landscape Boards</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="543" kind="question">
        <name>Ms BEDFORD</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Florey</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2021-11-16">
            <name>Landscape Boards</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2021-11-16T15:57:45" />
        <text id="20211116726991d7ef264d3580000953">
          <timeStamp time="2021-11-16T15:57:45" />
          <by role="member" id="543">Ms BEDFORD (Florey) (15:57):</by>  My question is again to the Minister for Environment and Water. How is funding decided under the new landscape boards, and why have some local groups—like the very hardworking Friends of Dry Creek—had their funding under this new scheme reduced to the point that they can no longer cover their costs?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4837" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. D.J. SPEIRS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Black</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Environment and Water</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2021-11-16">
            <name>Landscape Boards</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2021-11-16T15:58:04" />
        <text id="20211116726991d7ef264d3580000954">
          <timeStamp time="2021-11-16T15:58:04" />
          <by role="member" id="4837">The Hon. D.J. SPEIRS (Black—Minister for Environment and Water) (15:58):</by>  I would dispute that that has been the case. There is actually much more grant funding available under the new Green Adelaide and regional landscape board model through grants than was ever the case before. There are both grants: the Grassroots Grants, which for the first time are legislated, and they are $2 million per year; and then there is the Friends of Parks grants which, as I actually mentioned in answer to an earlier question today, have increased from $60,000 to $90,000 to $750,000.</text>
        <text id="20211116726991d7ef264d3580000955">There was some concern that there wasn't transparency around some of the methodologies by which the friends groups were accessing funds for their work, so we've got a very straightforward grants program so that they can access funding but also can acquit that in an accountable way. So I've got confidence there is actually not less funding available but much more funding to a multiple of many times over.</text>
        <text id="20211116726991d7ef264d3580000956">Not only do friends groups have access to more grants funding but they also have access to the advice, expertise and insight from a much expanded National Parks and Wildlife Service which had been—again, returning to the substance of a previous answer—decimated under the previous government.</text>
        <text id="20211116726991d7ef264d3580000957">We have rebuilt the capacity of the National Parks and Wildlife Service. Ranger numbers have gone from 93 to 138 as the volunteer workforce. I would be happy to talk with the Friends of Dry Creek Trail and understand their challenges around funding, but there are more grants available for their good work than ever before and I thank them for that work.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>