<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2021-11-16" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="8220" />
  <endPage num="8587" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Kangaroo Island Wharf Facility</name>
      <text id="20211116e10bcdde2714497690000589">
        <heading>Kangaroo Island Wharf Facility</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5084" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MALINAUSKAS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Croydon</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2021-11-16">
            <name>Kangaroo Island Wharf Facility</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2021-11-16T14:49:30" />
        <text id="20211116e10bcdde2714497690000590">
          <timeStamp time="2021-11-16T14:49:30" />
          <by role="member" id="5084">Mr MALINAUSKAS (Croydon—Leader of the Opposition) (14:49):</by>  My question is to the Premier. Does the Premier stand by his public statements regarding procedural fairness afforded to the Attorney-General? With your leave, sir, and that of the house, I will explain.</text>
        <page num="8516" />
        <text id="20211116e10bcdde2714497690000591">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5084" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>Mr MALINAUSKAS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20211116e10bcdde2714497690000592">
          <by role="member" id="5084">Mr MALINAUSKAS:</by>  This morning on FIVEaa radio, the Premier publicly stated as fact that 'Dr Gray herself said yesterday that the Attorney hadn't been offered procedural fairness whatsoever'.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2021-11-16T14:50:00" />
        <text id="20211116e10bcdde2714497690000593">
          <timeStamp time="2021-11-16T14:50:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL (Dunstan—Premier) (14:50):</by>  I thank the Leader of the Opposition for allowing me to address this issue. I think Dr Gray in her closing statement did address the aspect of procedural fairness, and in her closing summation she made it clear that the Deputy Premier had not had an opportunity to go back with her submission. That would be offered in the coming days. Until that has been afforded it would not seem you could reach any conclusion.</text>
        <text id="20211116e10bcdde2714497690000594">It is a fundamental of our system that people need to be afforded procedural fairness. That had not occurred when she made her statement to the committee yesterday. Subsequently, we are all waiting—and the committee needs to be waiting—for the Attorney's submission. I'm happy to find the reference in her document if that would assist the parliament.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>