<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2021-10-26" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7962" />
  <endPage num="8321" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>St Kilda Mangroves</name>
      <page num="8267" />
      <text id="20211026ffecf52e75c548d390000513">
        <heading>St Kilda Mangroves</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4622" kind="question">
        <name>Dr CLOSE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Port Adelaide</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2021-10-26">
            <name>St Kilda Mangroves</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2021-10-26T14:51:58" />
        <text id="20211026ffecf52e75c548d390000514">
          <timeStamp time="2021-10-26T14:51:58" />
          <by role="member" id="4622">Dr CLOSE (Port Adelaide—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:51):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Environment and Water. Has any of the work on the death of the mangroves in St Kilda done by Peri Coleman been used to debrief the minister by his department?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4837" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. D.J. SPEIRS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Black</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Environment and Water</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2021-10-26">
            <name>St Kilda Mangroves</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2021-10-26T14:52:11" />
        <text id="20211026ffecf52e75c548d390000515">
          <timeStamp time="2021-10-26T14:52:11" />
          <by role="member" id="4837">The Hon. D.J. SPEIRS (Black—Minister for Environment and Water) (14:52):</by>  I'm sure my departments have used various sources in terms of the science they rely on to brief me. I'm not sure whether they have relied on Peri Coleman's scientific analysis or not. I know they have spoken to her throughout the process, but I am not sure whether that has been a significant part of the building of an evidence base or not.</text>
        <text id="20211026ffecf52e75c548d390000516">What I do know is that we have a very rigorous suite of scientific expertise feeding into this situation, peer-reviewed science. That is the important thing here: the need for peer-reviewed science, not just opinion but—</text>
        <text id="20211026ffecf52e75c548d390000517">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20211026ffecf52e75c548d390000518">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER</by>:  Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4837" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. D.J. SPEIRS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20211026ffecf52e75c548d390000519">
          <by role="member" id="4837">The Hon. D.J. SPEIRS:</by>  —actually taking a situation where the various facts, the measurements, the inputs are from scientists not just in South Australia. The panel of scientists that has been established to assist the EPA, the Department for Energy and Mining and the Department for Environment and Water is actually made up of people from across Australia, including some of the foremost experts on the health of mangroves and the establishment of mangrove fields across this nation.</text>
        <text id="20211026ffecf52e75c548d390000520">I am very confident that the departments I have responsibility for, and various stakeholder departments in there working through this issue, have drawn on the pre-eminent science available.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>