<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2021-10-12" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7538" />
  <endPage num="7974" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Motions</name>
    <text id="20211012c2b8f0d52d5545e7a0001784">
      <heading>Motions</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Sessional Orders</name>
      <text id="20211012c2b8f0d52d5545e7a0001785">
        <heading>Sessional Orders</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5387" kind="speech">
        <name>Mr BROWN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Playford</electorate>
        <startTime time="2021-10-12T22:43:23" />
        <text id="20211012c2b8f0d52d5545e7a0001786">
          <timeStamp time="2021-10-12T22:43:23" />
          <by role="member" id="5387">Mr BROWN (Playford) (22:43):</by>  I move that the house adopts the following sessional order:</text>
        <text id="20211012c2b8f0d52d5545e7a0001787">
          <inserted>When the house stands adjourned, the Speaker may require the house meet at an alternative time than that originally fixed:</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20211012c2b8f0d52d5545e7a0001788">
          <inserted>1.&amp;#x9;The Speaker, if satisfied that the public interest requires it, may give notice that the house will meet at an alternative time;</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20211012c2b8f0d52d5545e7a0001789">
          <inserted>2.&amp;#x9;The house meets at the time stated in the notice;</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20211012c2b8f0d52d5545e7a0001790">
          <inserted>3.&amp;#x9;The business to be transacted when the house meets at the alternative time includes the business set down on the <term>Notice Paper</term> for the day to which the house had originally adjourned;</inserted>
        </text>
        <page num="7923" />
        <text id="20211012c2b8f0d52d5545e7a0001791">
          <inserted>4.&amp;#x9;The dates set down for the remainder of the business on the <term>Notice Paper</term> may be altered by a motion moved without notice on the day on which the house resumes after the adjournment.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="20211012c2b8f0d52d5545e7a0001792">I want to indicate that this sessional order is very similar to standing order 57 except that, again, in the spirit of independence that this house has now established for itself, it no longer requires the minister to advise the Speaker that they request that the house sit. It then frees the Speaker to use their own judgement to make the house sit at an alternative time.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4342" kind="speech">
        <name>The Hon. D.C. VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Stuart</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Energy and Mining</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2021-10-12T22:44:46" />
        <text id="20211012c2b8f0d52d5545e7a0001793">
          <timeStamp time="2021-10-12T22:44:46" />
          <by role="member" id="4342">The Hon. D.C. VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN (Stuart—Minister for Energy and Mining) (22:44):</by>  It is no surprise, I am sure, to those opposite that the government does not support this, and for several reasons, including the fact that those opposite should be completely ashamed of themselves—all of those opposite should be completely ashamed of themselves for—</text>
        <text id="20211012c2b8f0d52d5545e7a0001794">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20211012c2b8f0d52d5545e7a0001795">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER</by>:  Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4342" kind="speech" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. D.C. VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20211012c2b8f0d52d5545e7a0001796">
          <by role="member" id="4342">The Hon. D.C. VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN:</by>  Those opposite should be completely ashamed of themselves for trying to jam something like this through, saying—and I think I will get this right—the whip from the opposition said 'in the house's newly found independence'. Mr Speaker, complete disrespect for the process of parliament, complete disrespect for the fact that—</text>
        <text id="20211012c2b8f0d52d5545e7a0001797">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5084">Mr Malinauskas interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20211012c2b8f0d52d5545e7a0001798">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Order, the leader!</text>
        <text id="20211012c2b8f0d52d5545e7a0001799">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="4339">Mr Whetstone interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20211012c2b8f0d52d5545e7a0001800">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Member for Chaffey!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4342" kind="speech" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. D.C. VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20211012c2b8f0d52d5545e7a0001801">
          <by role="member" id="4342">The Hon. D.C. VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN:</by>  Complete disrespect for the fact that there are two houses of this parliament, there is a Governor who will make some decisions, too, with regard to legislation if it passes both houses of parliament but, more importantly, the idea that the opposition would try to jam this through in this way is completely disgraceful.</text>
        <text id="20211012c2b8f0d52d5545e7a0001802">I did actually hear members opposite during the debate on the last bill that we discussed in this chamber talking about how reverent they were with regard to convention, talking about how they thought it was very important that we conform with convention, that they actually respected that. But, of course, those words have just evaporated in a very short period of time because they want to throw all of that convention out of the window immediately.</text>
        <text id="20211012c2b8f0d52d5545e7a0001803">For a wide range of reasons we oppose this bill. It is pure, base politicking without the best interests of South Australians in mind, just the best interests of those opposite. It is completely unacceptable and I know that the public will feel exactly the same way.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5387" kind="speech">
        <name>Mr BROWN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Playford</electorate>
        <startTime time="2021-10-12T22:47:31" />
        <text id="20211012c2b8f0d52d5545e7a0001804">
          <timeStamp time="2021-10-12T22:47:31" />
          <by role="member" id="5387">Mr BROWN (Playford) (22:47):</by>  I will not take up much of the house's time except to say that this is an opportunity for this house to declare that it believes that you, Mr Speaker, should be given the independence to make these decisions without having to be under the yoke of this government.</text>
        <text id="20211012c2b8f0d52d5545e7a0001805">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="4847">Mr Knoll interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20211012c2b8f0d52d5545e7a0001806">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Order, member for Schubert! The question before the house is that the motion to adopt the sessional order be agreed to. The Speaker counts the house ahead of consideration of the question for the adoption of a sessional order. There being an absolute majority of members present, I will put the question.</text>
        <text id="20211012c2b8f0d52d5545e7a0001807">Motion carried.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>