<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2021-09-23" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7398" />
  <endPage num="7814" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Estimates Replies</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Impairment Assessment Guidelines</name>
      <text id="20210923270149b6ac11422390001957">
        <inserted>
          <heading>Impairment Assessment Guidelines</heading>
        </inserted>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5571" kind="question">
        <name>In reply to Mr SZAKACS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2021-09-23">
            <name>Impairment Assessment Guidelines</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20210923270149b6ac11422390001958">
          <inserted>In reply to <by role="member" id="5571">Mr SZAKACS (Cheltenham)</by> (28 July 2021).  (Estimates Committee B)</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Treasurer</electorate>
        <text id="20210923270149b6ac11422390001959">
          <inserted>
            <by role="member" id="">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer):</by>  I have been advised the following:</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20210923270149b6ac11422390001960">
          <inserted>Firstly I would like to clarify that ReturnToWorkSA did not provide me with<term></term>'preliminary recommendations'.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20210923270149b6ac11422390001961">
          <inserted>ReturnToWorkSA collects data and feedback on an ongoing basis with respect to the operation of the Impairment Assessment Guidelines<term></term>(the Guidelines). This data, over time, indicated a need to update the guidelines<term></term>to deliver greater clarity, consistency, and transparency, and to reflect relevant medical and clinical advancements and refinements. </inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20210923270149b6ac11422390001962">
          <inserted>ReturnToWorkSA, in addition to appropriately trained in-house staff, sought external expert medical advice to inform them in drafting a set of proposed changes that could be put out for consultation in accordance with the requirements of the Return to Work Act<term></term>2014. </inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20210923270149b6ac11422390001963">
          <inserted>Those proposed changes were provided to me with a request for approval to consult on my behalf. I approved a broader consultation than that required by the act and the proposed changes were distributed for feedback on 28 May 2021. No consultants were retained by ReturnToWorkSA as part of this process.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20210923270149b6ac11422390001964">
          <inserted>As you would be aware, on 24 August 2021 the state government published the updated impairment assessment guidelines, which incorporated extensive consultation and community feedback, resulting in amendments to more than 30 of the over 70 proposed substantive changes, removal of any set deduction in benefits for pre-existing injury and protection of worker choice of assessor. </inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20210923270149b6ac11422390001965">
          <inserted>With respect to the medical experts who informed the original proposed changes, I am advised that ReturnToWorkSA is seeking their permission to publish their names on the ReturnToWorkSA website and that at the time of preparing this advice the majority had provided their permission. </inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20210923270149b6ac11422390001966">
          <inserted>I also understand your office has made a freedom of information request to my office and ReturnToWorkSA, and that a response will be provided in due course.</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>