<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2021-09-07" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6740" />
  <endPage num="7171" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Gawler Line Electrification</name>
      <text id="202109074f91942f479d446d80000591">
        <heading>Gawler Line Electrification</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5084" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MALINAUSKAS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Croydon</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2021-09-07">
            <name>Gawler Line Electrification</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2021-09-07T14:58:15" />
        <text id="202109074f91942f479d446d80000592">
          <timeStamp time="2021-09-07T14:58:15" />
          <by role="member" id="5084">Mr MALINAUSKAS (Croydon—Leader of the Opposition) (14:58):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Infrastructure and Transport. Are workers being flown in from New South Wales or Victoria to work on the Gawler rail electrification project despite the current risks involved with allowing people to enter South Australia from these other states?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2021-09-07">
            <name>Gawler Line Electrification</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2021-09-07T14:58:32" />
        <text id="202109074f91942f479d446d80000593">
          <timeStamp time="2021-09-07T14:58:32" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL (Dunstan—Premier) (14:58):</by>  All the decisions with regard to exemptions for essential workers are made not by ministers but they are made, of course, by SA Health. We've got very strict protocols in place. We do have level 6 restrictions in place with other jurisdictions. Therefore, if they are essential workers, those applications for an exemption to those current restrictions are passed through to SA Health. They have an exemptions committee which meets, and they make a determination.</text>
        <text id="202109074f91942f479d446d80000594">If they do see fit to grant an exemption, and this of course occurs in certain circumstances, they develop a risk mitigation strategy for those essential workers, and that is a matter completely and utterly for SA Health. We don't interfere in that process. Of course, we do from time to time support applications from people who are making that application because there are projects, but ultimately we don't have any say.</text>
        <text id="202109074f91942f479d446d80000595">Sometimes the exemptions are granted and sometimes they are not. We don't dispute that, of course. I think it is only right that we continue to have this separation with regard to the exemptions process. It has worked very well for us over a long period of time, and I expect it will continue to stay in place for some time to come.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>