<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2021-08-25" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6514" />
  <endPage num="6937" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <text id="202108250c77c958055e459290000556">
      <heading>Question Time</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Raethel, Ms H.</name>
      <text id="202108250c77c958055e459290000557">
        <heading>Raethel, Ms H.</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4841" kind="question">
        <name>Mr PICTON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Kaurna</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2021-08-25">
            <name>Raethel, Ms H.</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2021-08-25T14:40:14" />
        <text id="202108250c77c958055e459290000558">
          <timeStamp time="2021-08-25T14:40:14" />
          <by role="member" id="4841">Mr PICTON (Kaurna) (14:40):</by>  My question is to the Premier. Will the government refer to the Coroner the death of Ms Hazel Raethel regarding her missed cancer diagnosis at the Royal Adelaide Hospital in 2019? With your leave, sir, and that of the house, I will explain.</text>
        <text id="202108250c77c958055e459290000559">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4841" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>Mr PICTON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="202108250c77c958055e459290000560">
          <by role="member" id="4841">Mr PICTON:</by>  Hazel Raethel passed away in April last year, age 66, after a three-month delay in 2019 to inform her of a positive bowel cancer diagnosis of a colonoscopy that was performed at the Royal Adelaide Hospital. Hazel's daughter Ruth has told the ABC, and I quote, 'I'm disappointed in a system that's supposed to be there to help us and has failed miserably.'</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. V.A. CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning and Local Government</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2021-08-25T14:41:05" />
        <text id="202108250c77c958055e459290000561">
          <timeStamp time="2021-08-25T14:41:05" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">The Hon. V.A. CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Planning and Local Government) (14:41):</by>  I thank the member for the question. As he may be aware, the question of the actions of the Coroner is determined by the Coroners Act. There is power for referral, but it's ultimately the decision of the Coroner to determine whether there is a case for which there be an inquest or other inquiry, unless of course Mrs Raethel was within the reportable death obligation of which there are certain subsections that mandate that there be an inquest. I don't know sufficient particulars from what you have indicated.</text>
        <text id="202108250c77c958055e459290000562">Any member is able to request on behalf of their constituency any consideration by the Coroner, and I know frequently many of you do because sometimes you then come to me to try to hasten getting an answer in relation to that. Certainly, if there are matters which any member is concerned about, particularly if it's not in an area in which there is obviously a legal obligation already for the Coroner to undertake an inquest or a mandatory inquiry, then I would urge them to do so.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>