<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2021-08-25" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6514" />
  <endPage num="6937" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Kangaroo Island Wharf Facility</name>
      <text id="202108259c8230c4bc664fed90000536">
        <heading>Kangaroo Island Wharf Facility</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5572" kind="question">
        <name>Ms MICHAELS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2021-08-25">
            <name>Kangaroo Island Wharf Facility</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2021-08-25T14:36:32" />
        <text id="202108259c8230c4bc664fed90000537">
          <timeStamp time="2021-08-25T14:36:32" />
          <by role="member" id="5572">Ms MICHAELS (Enfield) (14:36):</by>  My question again is to the Minister for Planning. Did the Minister mislead the parliament on 2 August in response to my question about whether there has ever been a process undertaken by government to look at the best location for a port to export timber off from Kangaroo Island? With your leave, Mr Deputy Speaker, and that of the house, I will explain.</text>
        <text id="202108259c8230c4bc664fed90000538">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5572" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>Ms MICHAELS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="202108259c8230c4bc664fed90000539">
          <by role="member" id="5572">Ms MICHAELS:</by>  The minister, in estimates on 2 August, claimed that no process had been undertaken by the government to determine the best location for a new port on Kangaroo Island, but on page 30 of the assessment report the commission itself confirms the government, in regard to the Smith Bay proposal, contracted Wavelength Consulting Pty Ltd to, and I quote, 'determine whether Smith Bay was an appropriate site for the wharf and port facility and to test the viability of alternative sites'.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. A. Koutsantonis</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="202108259c8230c4bc664fed90000540">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. Koutsantonis:</by>  You can't lie to parliament.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Deputy Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="202108259c8230c4bc664fed90000541">
          <by role="office">The DEPUTY SPEAKER:</by>  Member for West Torrens, you are already on one warning.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. V.A. CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning and Local Government</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2021-08-25T14:37:32" />
        <page num="6550" />
        <text id="202108259c8230c4bc664fed90000542">
          <timeStamp time="2021-08-25T14:37:32" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">The Hon. V.A. CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Planning and Local Government) (14:37):</by>  In direct answer to the question, no. In relation to the report that was referred to at estimates, I did make further inquiry about whether anyone else had done that. My understanding was that that Department of Transport, which at the time was assisting under a previous iteration of this particular project, had commissioned a report. I'm not sure whether that was for the proponent or who paid for it or anything else, but I made that inquiry and, yes, there was a report prepared by a company called Wavelength. I can't remember their full name, but it's something like that and it's referred to in the assessment report.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>