<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2021-08-24" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6406" />
  <endPage num="6802" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Member for Waite</name>
      <text id="2021082479ad865db31248c0a0000417">
        <heading>Member for Waite</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5084" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MALINAUSKAS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Croydon</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2021-08-24">
            <name>Member for Waite</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2021-08-24T14:50:41" />
        <text id="2021082479ad865db31248c0a0000418">
          <timeStamp time="2021-08-24T14:50:41" />
          <by role="member" id="5084">Mr MALINAUSKAS (Croydon—Leader of the Opposition) (14:50):</by>  A supplementary question: does that mean the Premier believes that any position Mr Duluk could have in a future Liberal Party is untenable?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2021-08-24">
            <name>Member for Waite</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2021-08-24T14:50:52" />
        <text id="2021082479ad865db31248c0a0000419">
          <timeStamp time="2021-08-24T14:50:52" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL (Dunstan—Premier) (14:50):</by>  You are taking statements from a long time ago and trying to extrapolate on them at the moment. The reality was that there was a police investigation which resulted in court proceedings, and it was completely untenable for Mr Duluk to sit in the Liberal parliamentary room at that time.</text>
        <text id="2021082479ad865db31248c0a0000420">There has been a case. It has been before the court, and the court has made its decision. There is also a parliamentary inquiry that was underway that was paused. I presume that will resume, but that is ultimately a matter for the Speaker, not the Liberal Party. However, I do make the point that there is a court decision that has been made today and that there has been a full apology for the behaviour from the member for Waite. Ultimately, I expect that the parliamentary inquiry will resume.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>