<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2021-06-24" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6304" />
  <endPage num="6670" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Timber Industry</name>
      <text id="202106247fe11914831145ec90000712">
        <heading>Timber Industry</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4844" kind="question">
        <name>Mr BELL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Mount Gambier</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2021-06-24">
            <name>Timber Industry</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2021-06-24T15:16:24" />
        <text id="202106247fe11914831145ec90000713">
          <timeStamp time="2021-06-24T15:16:24" />
          <by role="member" id="4844">Mr BELL (Mount Gambier) (15:16):</by>  My question is to the minister for forestry. Does the minister support the application by Kangaroo Island Plantation Timbers for a wharf to be built on Kangaroo Island?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5380" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. D.K.B. BASHAM</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Finniss</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Primary Industries and Regional Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2021-06-24">
            <name>Timber Industry</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2021-06-24T15:16:40" />
        <text id="202106247fe11914831145ec90000714">
          <timeStamp time="2021-06-24T15:16:40" />
          <by role="member" id="5380">The Hon. D.K.B. BASHAM (Finniss—Minister for Primary Industries and Regional Development) (15:16):</by>  I thank the member for his question. Certainly, we are looking at every opportunity as to how we might be able to get timber off Kangaroo Island. It's certainly a big challenge that's sitting there. There is a lot of timber that has a limited life now that it has been burnt that we have to deal with, so it's something that we are working on with KIPT, plus the private growers themselves on the island, as well as being in conversations with other mills on the mainland, etc., as well as the federal government. As mentioned yesterday, there have been discussions with the federal government about what we can do in this space to see whether there is an opportunity to get that timber off.</text>
        <text id="202106247fe11914831145ec90000715">There is urgency in getting that timber off and the opportunity to get that timber off is limited in the short term by how we can actually do it. My understanding is that, in the short term, to be able to achieve it, there are time lines to deliver structural timber to the South Australian community but also to make sure we are able to use the timber that has been damaged in this process. We are very limited in what we can do.</text>
        <page num="6639" />
        <text id="202106247fe11914831145ec90000716">Trucks onto the ferry is the simplest option and we are having conversations with the federal government on whether they are prepared to assist in that movement. There are also other options that could be in place—where timber is carted into Kingscote itself—to have a look at whether there are options of barging that timber off to different locations to get that processed. So the issue is still very much alive. It's very much a conversation that we are having, to look at these options to see whether there is an opportunity.</text>
        <text id="202106247fe11914831145ec90000717">This timber, as I said, has a very limited time line in its ability to be processed—a maximum of 10 years once the timber has been burnt before it can be processed, and that's only if it has been submerged. We are working through this to see what opportunities there are, particularly in the next 12 months, as there is huge demand right across Australia for structural timber. There is an opportunity for us, working with the federal government, to make sure that we can get this timber to market so that we are able to see not just the benefit to the timber being processed but—</text>
        <text id="202106247fe11914831145ec90000718">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="3117">The Hon. L.W.K. Bignell interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="202106247fe11914831145ec90000719">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Mawson is warned for a second time.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5380" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. D.K.B. BASHAM</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="202106247fe11914831145ec90000720">
          <by role="member" id="5380">The Hon. D.K.B. BASHAM:</by>  We are making sure that we get that timber off in a timely manner so that we can process it and get that timber back into the market so there is an opportunity for jobs to be maintained going forward. The building industry needs this timber, so we are working on it to make sure that we can—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4844">
        <name>Mr BELL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="202106247fe11914831145ec90000721">
          <by role="member" id="4844">Mr BELL:</by>  Point of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="202106247fe11914831145ec90000722">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The minister will resume his seat. The member for Mount Gambier rises on a point of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4844">
        <name>Mr BELL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="202106247fe11914831145ec90000723">
          <by role="member" id="4844">Mr BELL:</by>  Relevance, sir. The question was specifically whether or not the minister supported the building of a wharf. I understand there is some relation to burnt timber, but that is not the point of the question. The point of the question was whether the minister himself actually supported the building of a wharf.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="202106247fe11914831145ec90000724">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The point of order is pursuant to standing order 98. I note the question was directed more specifically to the matter of the wharf. In the context of timber transport, the minister was addressing the broader circumstances. I do direct the minister to the specific question. The minister has the call. I think the minister has concluded his answer.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>