<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2021-06-23" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6170" />
  <endPage num="6594" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Hove Level Crossing</name>
      <text id="202106232c2ecfe00cfd44e280000653">
        <heading>Hove Level Crossing</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">West Torrens</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2021-06-23">
            <name>Hove Level Crossing</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2021-06-23T14:55:42" />
        <text id="202106232c2ecfe00cfd44e280000654">
          <timeStamp time="2021-06-23T14:55:42" />
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS (West Torrens) (14:55):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Transport and Infrastructure. How much taxpayer money has been expended on planning studies, geotechnical surveys, consultants, compulsory acquisitions and departmental resources on the Hove grade separation over the last three years?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4843" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. C.L. WINGARD</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Gibson</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Infrastructure and Transport</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Recreation</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2021-06-23">
            <name>Hove Level Crossing</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2021-06-23T14:55:57" />
        <text id="202106232c2ecfe00cfd44e280000655">
          <timeStamp time="2021-06-23T14:55:57" />
          <by role="member" id="4843">The Hon. C.L. WINGARD (Gibson—Minister for Infrastructure and Transport, Minister for Recreation, Sport and Racing) (14:55):</by>  I don't have that figure on me, but I can say it is significantly less than the Gawler electrification money that was wasted by those opposite when they had that project on again, off again. I think for that project it was $47 million. I know it was far, far less than that. So $47 million is what they wasted.</text>
        <text id="202106232c2ecfe00cfd44e280000656">Again, the work that we have done will actually be work that is valuable for that project going forward. We are very happy to have done that work. Again, I stress the point that when they were in government they didn't do it. We have got that work done now. It will help with any planning into the future.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>