<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2021-06-09" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5874" />
  <endPage num="6319" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Regional Landscape Levy</name>
      <text id="2021060901e180b04d6f43cea0000840">
        <heading>Regional Landscape Levy</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5385" kind="question">
        <name>Mr ELLIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Narungga</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2021-06-09">
            <name>Regional Landscape Levy</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2021-06-09T15:07:43" />
        <text id="2021060901e180b04d6f43cea0000841">
          <timeStamp time="2021-06-09T15:07:43" />
          <by role="member" id="5385">Mr ELLIS (Narungga) (15:07):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Environment and Water. Will the minister please inform the ratepayers of the Yorke Peninsula Council why their regional landscape levy is so much higher than ratepayers of the Barossa Council. With your leave, sir, and that of the house, I will explain.</text>
        <text id="2021060901e180b04d6f43cea0000842">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5385" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>Mr ELLIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2021060901e180b04d6f43cea0000843">
          <by role="member" id="5385">Mr ELLIS:</by>  The Yorke Peninsula Council have been charged with collecting almost $1.2 million for the Northern and Yorke Landscape Board, with a dividend of just over $6,000; the Barossa Council, with a significantly larger rate income, is charged with collecting less than $550,000, with fees payable to the council being just less than $6,000. Why are the people of Yorke Peninsula doing all the heavy lifting?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4837" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. D.J. SPEIRS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Black</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Environment and Water</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2021-06-09T15:08:24" />
        <text id="2021060901e180b04d6f43cea0000844">
          <timeStamp time="2021-06-09T15:08:24" />
          <by role="member" id="4837">The Hon. D.J. SPEIRS (Black—Minister for Environment and Water) (15:08):</by>  I thank the member for Narungga for his very valid question. We have to go back in history a little while to the bad old days under the Labor government to see why this anomaly occurs. It is because under the city-centric Labor government the regional natural resources management boards had a much higher levy rate than the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges NRM Board. That meant when we changed the boundaries and there was crossover in the transition—</text>
        <text id="2021060901e180b04d6f43cea0000845">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2021060901e180b04d6f43cea0000846">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4837" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. D.J. SPEIRS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2021060901e180b04d6f43cea0000847">
          <by role="member" id="4837">The Hon. D.J. SPEIRS:</by>  —between the landscape system and the natural resources management system, where boards came together with bits of the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Board and bits of the former Northern and Yorke board, there is a discrepancy between the way that levies are calculated.</text>
        <text id="2021060901e180b04d6f43cea0000848">Over time, so that no-one is worse off—and, in fact, levies drop for a significant proportion of the member for Narungga's electorate—there is a levy transition scheme put in place. So that that drop doesn't happen in a dramatic sense, there is a transition scheme in place over several years to equalise. Over some years, the Yorke Peninsula Council and other councils in that region will see their levy slowly stepped down to meet that former levy calculation as was calculated by the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges NRM Board.</text>
        <text id="2021060901e180b04d6f43cea0000849">It is quite a complicated process. It is a legacy from the broken, bureaucratic, centralised, out of touch system known as natural resources management in South Australia. Our new landscape boards are back to basics, grassroots, sort out the pest plants and animals, get sustainable agricultural programs in place, sort out water quality and water resource management—get those things right so that the platforms of sustainable landscape management are in place building resilience across the landscape so that biodiversity will survive and thrive.</text>
        <text id="2021060901e180b04d6f43cea0000850">This is our approach—local people on the boards. I am delighted by the Northern and Yorke board and their work so far, chaired by the Hon. Caroline Schaefer with a whole range of really excellent people from across that region. I had dinner with them in the Clare Valley last week, talking about the projects they have been advancing: weed control and pest control projects, working out those very tricky water allocation plans that are required throughout the region and working on coast protection projects, particularly in the Narungga electorate.</text>
        <text id="2021060901e180b04d6f43cea0000851">Importantly, one of their really strategic flagship projects is the Marna Banggara project, formerly known as the Great Southern Ark, a fence across the bottom of Yorke Peninsula capturing the land where we find Innes National Park and also quite a bit of other farming country, removing pests from that landscape and reintroducing a number of native species, including bettongs. That will be a great environmental project, and it will also be a real tourism drawcard to the member for Narungga's region.</text>
        <page num="6221" />
        <text id="2021060901e180b04d6f43cea0000852">That is the back-to-basics landscape levy in action. The residents in Narungga can be assured that, rather than being gouged as they were under the previous Labor government that had no care or interest in regional South Australia, we are getting back to basics and we are reducing their levy over the coming years so that it matches the Adelaide region where the Barossa used to be.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>