<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2021-05-25" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5516" />
  <endPage num="5892" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Household Appliances, Demand-Response Standards</name>
      <text id="20210525165309abb0114673a0000637">
        <heading>Household Appliances, Demand-Response Standards</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">West Torrens</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2021-05-25">
            <name>Household Appliances, Demand-Response Standards</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2021-05-25T15:03:50" />
        <text id="20210525165309abb0114673a0000638">
          <timeStamp time="2021-05-25T15:03:50" />
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS (West Torrens) (15:03):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Mining and Energy. Did the minister mislead the public regarding any government decision to bring forward new demand-response standards for household appliances as part of a policy agreed at COAG? With your leave, sir, and that of the house, I will explain.</text>
        <text id="20210525165309abb0114673a0000639">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20210525165309abb0114673a0000640">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  On 15 April this year, the minister publicly stated, and I quote, 'I never expressed any keenness at all,' in regard to these new standards. However, yesterday in the Budget and Finance Committee, the Department for Energy and Mining said in their evidence:</text>
        <page num="5554" />
        <text id="20210525165309abb0114673a0000641">
          <inserted>The former COAG Energy Council had endorsed a decision regulatory impact statement including demand response capability into a number of appliances: air conditioning, pool pumps, hot water services and electric vehicle chargers. I will have to check the date on that, but it was a year or so ago. What we have gone out for consultation with industry is bringing forward those requirements to apply in South Australia earlier than the commonwealth timetable that was included in the DRIS.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="20210525165309abb0114673a0000642">The department was then asked by a committee member: 'Did he (the minister) approve of the consultation that you were conducting and the measures you were conducting them on?' The response from the department was, and I quote, 'Yes.'</text>
        <text id="20210525165309abb0114673a0000643">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20210525165309abb0114673a0000644">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for West Torrens will cease interjecting. The minister will resume his seat for a moment. The member for Schubert is warned. The member for Kaurna is warned for a second time. The Minister for Energy and Mining has the call.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4342" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. D.C. VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Stuart</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Energy and Mining</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2021-05-25T15:05:15" />
        <text id="20210525165309abb0114673a0000645">
          <timeStamp time="2021-05-25T15:05:15" />
          <by role="member" id="4342">The Hon. D.C. VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN (Stuart—Minister for Energy and Mining) (15:05):</by>  I missed if there was any difference between the question just asked and the question previously asked. I did notice that there was a difference in the information provided when the member sought leave to provide some additional information, but I think essentially it's the same question, so I refer the member for West Torrens and the chamber to my previous answer.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>