<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2021-05-13" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5440" />
  <endPage num="5820" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Shop Trading Hours</name>
      <text id="202105131a6a724fcc16455fb0000617">
        <heading>Shop Trading Hours</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="543" kind="question">
        <name>Ms BEDFORD</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Florey</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2021-05-13">
            <name>Shop Trading Hours</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2021-05-13T15:17:14" />
        <text id="202105131a6a724fcc16455fb0000618">
          <timeStamp time="2021-05-13T15:17:14" />
          <by role="member" id="543">Ms BEDFORD (Florey) (15:17):</by>  My supplementary to the Premier is: how will the government inform South Australians about the cons of their proposed retail trading referendum and what it will mean for businesses and workers?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="202105131a6a724fcc16455fb0000619">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Florey might repeat the question.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="543" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>Ms BEDFORD</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="202105131a6a724fcc16455fb0000620">
          <by role="member" id="543">Ms BEDFORD:</by>  How will the government inform South Australians about the cons—as in pros and cons—of their proposed retail trading referendum and what it will mean for businesses and workers? The way you have expressed it, there are only pros to it.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2021-05-13T15:17:45" />
        <page num="5787" />
        <text id="202105131a6a724fcc16455fb0000621">
          <timeStamp time="2021-05-13T15:17:45" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL (Dunstan—Premier) (15:17):</by>  I would remind the house that this is a matter which is before the parliament at the moment.</text>
        <text id="202105131a6a724fcc16455fb0000622">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="202105131a6a724fcc16455fb0000623">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="202105131a6a724fcc16455fb0000624">
          <by role="member" id="4338">The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL:</by>  I think it is in the other place.</text>
        <text id="202105131a6a724fcc16455fb0000625">
          <event kind="interjection">An honourable member interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="5480" />
        <text id="202105131a6a724fcc16455fb0000626">
          <by role="member" id="4338">The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL:</by>  Sorry, I may be incorrect. I was under the impression that it has been introduced in the other place. I am happy to check that.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="202105131a6a724fcc16455fb0000627">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  In that case, it's of no consequence for this house.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="202105131a6a724fcc16455fb0000628">
          <by role="member" id="4338">The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL:</by>  It is a matter which is before the other place at the moment. It is under active consideration. I note that the Labor Party, before the debate has even taken place, have already issued their position on this. That is very disappointing. We think that it deserves a respectful debate in the other place. We think that there are many advantages of this, which I have outlined in my previous answer.</text>
        <text id="202105131a6a724fcc16455fb0000629">If it is successful that there is a successful determination that we will put this to a referendum at the next election, then I'm quite sure there will be many people on both sides of the argument who will be making their points very clearly to the people of South Australia. But at this stage it looks like this reform, this important reform, this job-creating reform that we so desperately need in South Australia, is going to be scuttled by the Leader of the Opposition and the Australian Labor Party.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>