<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2021-05-13" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5440" />
  <endPage num="5820" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Child Protection</name>
      <text id="20210513c98c4b686a71462680000449">
        <heading>Child Protection</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4846" kind="question">
        <name>Ms HILDYARD</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Reynell</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2021-05-13">
            <name>Child Protection</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2021-05-13T14:47:25" />
        <text id="20210513c98c4b686a71462680000450">
          <timeStamp time="2021-05-13T14:47:25" />
          <by role="member" id="4846">Ms HILDYARD (Reynell) (14:47):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Child Protection. What is deemed a critical incident?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4340" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R. SANDERSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Adelaide</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Child Protection</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2021-05-13">
            <name>Child Protection</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2021-05-13T14:47:38" />
        <text id="20210513c98c4b686a71462680000451">
          <timeStamp time="2021-05-13T14:47:38" />
          <by role="member" id="4340">The Hon. R. SANDERSON (Adelaide—Minister for Child Protection) (14:47):</by>  As the member would be well aware, we recently had the Rice review, which was a report into significant incident reporting, which is continuing and is underway currently. I can give the member an update on how the Rice review is going. On 16 February 2021—</text>
        <text id="20210513c98c4b686a71462680000452">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20210513c98c4b686a71462680000453">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER</by>:  Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4340" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. R. SANDERSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20210513c98c4b686a71462680000454">
          <by role="member" id="4340">The Hon. R. SANDERSON:</by>  —the Attorney-General tabled the final report of the Rice review in parliament. Redactions in the report were made to protect the identities of children. There were recommendations. I will just go further to the part that it was regarding. We have taken it further than was actually expected. Recommendations of the Rice review included:</text>
        <text id="20210513c98c4b686a71462680000455">
          <inserted>That the Chief Executive be asked to develop instructions and guidance that ensure that the Minister and senior Department officers are advised as soon as reasonably possible of any allegation of a serious criminal act against a client of the Department.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="20210513c98c4b686a71462680000456">And that recommendation 12, which was the Allen report, be implemented:</text>
        <text id="20210513c98c4b686a71462680000457">
          <inserted>That the Chief Executive be asked to ensure department policies and directions to staff are unambiguously clear that incidents likely to attract media interest, and any approaches from the media, are reported to the Minister, the Chief Executive and the responsible division head as quickly as possible. Guidelines distinguishing ‘high’ and ‘low’ importance matters will need to be developed to ensure 'good news travels fast, bad news travels faster'.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="20210513c98c4b686a71462680000458">Recommendation 3:</text>
        <text id="20210513c98c4b686a71462680000459">
          <inserted>3.&amp;#x9;That the Minister advise the Chief Executive, in writing, about what events/incidents about which she wants to be informed. This process should take place when the Minister takes office and be reviewed on an on-going…basis.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20210513c98c4b686a71462680000460">
          <inserted>4.&amp;#x9;That the Chief Executive undertake a comprehensive staff education programme directed towards a knowledge and use of the existing Incident Management Procedure.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20210513c98c4b686a71462680000461">
          <inserted>5.&amp;#x9;That consideration be given by the Government to increasing the maximum penalty for a breach of Written Directions to 3 years (for a first contravention) and 4 years (for second and subsequent contraventions).</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20210513c98c4b686a71462680000462">
          <inserted>6.&amp;#x9;That consideration be given by the Government that a person arrested for breach of Written Directions, be a 'prescribed applicant' for the purposes of the Bail Act, 1985.</inserted>
        </text>
        <page num="5779" />
        <text continued="true" id="20210513c98c4b686a71462680000463">This is ongoing. My department just recently gave feedback on the suggested new incident reporting procedure. It is still underway and I will get back to the house.</text>
        <text id="20210513c98c4b686a71462680000464">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20210513c98c4b686a71462680000465">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The leader!</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>