<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2021-05-05" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5104" />
  <endPage num="5506" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Northern Adelaide Irrigation Scheme</name>
      <text id="2021050539d1d217c4f245ed80000583">
        <heading>Northern Adelaide Irrigation Scheme</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4622" kind="question">
        <name>Dr CLOSE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Port Adelaide</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2021-05-05">
            <name>Northern Adelaide Irrigation Scheme</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2021-05-05T15:06:19" />
        <text id="2021050539d1d217c4f245ed80000584">
          <timeStamp time="2021-05-05T15:06:19" />
          <by role="member" id="4622">Dr CLOSE (Port Adelaide—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (15:06):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Environment and Water. Is the price of water from the Northern Adelaide Irrigation Scheme, including the initial capital contribution required, competitive when compared to other recycled water schemes across Australia?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4837" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. D.J. SPEIRS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Black</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Environment and Water</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2021-05-05">
            <name>Northern Adelaide Irrigation Scheme</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2021-05-05T15:06:38" />
        <text id="2021050539d1d217c4f245ed80000585">
          <timeStamp time="2021-05-05T15:06:38" />
          <by role="member" id="4837">The Hon. D.J. SPEIRS (Black—Minister for Environment and Water) (15:06):</by>  It's not for me to make a judgment as to whether it is competitive or not because that is, in my view, for the market to decide and to drive. Clearly, three gigalitres of water have already been signed up to and people have been willing to pay the prescribed rates for that. I understand that SA Water are contacted on a weekly basis by potential buyers of that water and, as I mentioned, there are a number of commercial negotiations in their advanced stages, so I would suggest that the trajectory is evidence that the price of this water is competitive.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>