<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2021-03-18" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4698" />
  <endPage num="5092" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>COVID-19 QR Code Security</name>
      <text id="20210318fd726a0fbaef45c480000527">
        <heading>COVID-19 QR Code Security</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="543" kind="question">
        <name>Ms BEDFORD</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Florey</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2021-03-18">
            <name>COVID-19 QR Code Security</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2021-03-18T14:55:15" />
        <text id="20210318fd726a0fbaef45c480000528">
          <timeStamp time="2021-03-18T14:55:15" />
          <by role="member" id="543">Ms BEDFORD (Florey) (14:55):</by>  Supplementary, Mr Speaker: seeing as the Attorney just reminded me that I had asked that question, have we established yet what law would be breached if someone did take photographs of the pages of information outside supermarkets?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. V.A. CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning and Local Government</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2021-03-18">
            <name>COVID-19 QR Code Security</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2021-03-18T14:55:30" />
        <text id="20210318fd726a0fbaef45c480000529">
          <timeStamp time="2021-03-18T14:55:30" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">The Hon. V.A. CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Planning and Local Government) (14:55):</by>  I think I informed the member previously that there is a breach in relation to the act for the dealing of data, and I think from memory it is about a $30,000 fine. In addition, there is the direction that has been issued by the police commissioner with respect to the $1,000 I have just referred to; so there are two aspects there.</text>
        <text id="20210318fd726a0fbaef45c480000530">I think I also informed the member and the house previously that taking a photograph of anything isn't necessarily in itself a breach of the act, but that is a matter for consideration by the police, especially if there is some concern that there may be the potential for that information being used for some other purpose, and certainly if it is contrary to the act. Should the member, I think I said at the time, be aware of any constituent concern about that, I would advise that they refer the matter to the police for their investigation.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>