<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2021-03-04" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4460" />
  <endPage num="4862" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Murray-Darling Basin Plan</name>
      <text id="20210304977a5db9b585432db0000326">
        <heading>Murray-Darling Basin Plan</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4622" kind="question">
        <name>Dr CLOSE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Port Adelaide</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2021-03-04">
            <name>Murray-Darling Basin Plan</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2021-03-04T14:14:45" />
        <text id="20210304977a5db9b585432db0000327">
          <timeStamp time="2021-03-04T14:14:45" />
          <by role="member" id="4622">Dr CLOSE (Port Adelaide—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:14):</by>  My question is to the Premier. Does the Premier have any advice that the 450 gigalitres due to South Australia by 2024 will not be delivered?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4837" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. D.J. SPEIRS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Black</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Environment and Water</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2021-03-04">
            <name>Murray-Darling Basin Plan</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2021-03-04T14:14:57" />
        <text id="20210304977a5db9b585432db0000328">
          <timeStamp time="2021-03-04T14:14:57" />
          <by role="member" id="4837">The Hon. D.J. SPEIRS (Black—Minister for Environment and Water) (14:14):</by>  The state government is still very much of the view that the plan continues apace. We have some concerns about the delivery of the 450 gigalitres by 2024, but that's no reason just to throw out the plan and stop doing projects. If the reconciliation of the plan might see some of the water come after 2024, we shouldn't just put projects on hold, rip that funding out of regional communities and deny them their jobs.</text>
        <text id="20210304977a5db9b585432db0000329">I have been very open about the functioning of the Murray-Darling Basin Plan and my opinions around that, that this is a plan that is working. It is delivering water, albeit more slowly than I would like. I think the key to getting this plan to work and getting the 450 gigalitres is to keep all the states at the table and continue to deliver water for the environment. It's water for the environment that we're after, the full length of the river, getting right down to the Murray Mouth, the Lower Lakes and the Coorong.</text>
        <text id="20210304977a5db9b585432db0000330">We are making significant progress towards that. There are 150 gigalitres of projects in assessment. I was able to announce moments ago a project of over 15 gigalitres of water, signed off and moving towards definite delivery, and that is so much more than the less than two gigalitres that the mob opposite delivered from South Australia.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5387" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Brown</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20210304977a5db9b585432db0000331">
          <by role="member" id="5387">Mr Brown:</by>  When are we getting our 450?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20210304977a5db9b585432db0000332">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Order, member for Playford!</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>