<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2021-02-16" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="73" />
  <endPage num="4343" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Grievance Debate</name>
    <text id="2021021647564e07061d4701b0000638">
      <heading>Grievance Debate</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Minister for Child Protection</name>
      <text id="2021021647564e07061d4701b0000639">
        <heading>Minister for Child Protection</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4846" kind="speech">
        <name>Ms HILDYARD</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Reynell</electorate>
        <startTime time="2021-02-16T15:12:38" />
        <text id="2021021647564e07061d4701b0000640">
          <timeStamp time="2021-02-16T15:12:38" />
          <by role="member" id="4846">Ms HILDYARD (Reynell) (15:12):</by>  I rise today to condemn, in the strongest possible terms, the Minister for Child Protection's abject and utter failure in relation to her handling of the abuse and pregnancy of two 13-year-old girls in state care. Every time I think of what those girls went through, I feel ill. Every time I think of the minister's complete obliviousness to their plight, like many others in our community, not only do I feel ill but I feel really, really angry.</text>
        <text id="2021021647564e07061d4701b0000641">When I listen, as we have had to today, to our Premier and our Deputy Premier protecting her obliviousness, that anger absolutely turns to fury. Our community and, so crucially importantly those girls in care—every child in care—deserve so much better. Following today's release of the damning Rice review by former District Court Judge Paul Rice, Minister Sanderson must step down or immediately be sacked. This independent review found the minister oversaw 'a significant failure regarding her handling of two sexual abuse cases'.</text>
        <text id="2021021647564e07061d4701b0000642">This review was launched late last year after the minister admitted that she was totally unaware of two cases of pregnant 13 year olds in state care who were sexually abused by paedophiles and, unbelievably, the second girl being enabled to live with a paedophile for two months. This is despite the fact that the minister publicly claimed she had changed reporting procedures after the first case emerged to ensure that she would be told. The fact is clear: the Rice review found that, despite the minister's public statements that she would be informed of serious sexual abuse, she has not actually issued this instruction to her own department. Judge Rice states:</text>
        <text id="2021021647564e07061d4701b0000643">
          <inserted>It was crucial for the Minister to tell the Department that she wanted to know about the serious sexual abuse of children under guardianship. This was a significant failure on the Minister's part.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="2021021647564e07061d4701b0000644">Judge Rice also found differences between the accounts of child protection department chief executive Cathy Taylor's evidence and the minister's, specifically in relation to a meeting the two held in September 2020. The minister told Judge Rice that she 'gave specific instructions to the chief executive that she was to be told in advance of sentencing' of serious sexual assaults. However, Judge Rice reports:</text>
        <text id="2021021647564e07061d4701b0000645">
          <inserted>It seemed that the Chief Executive may have had a different memory of the meeting than the Minister.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="2021021647564e07061d4701b0000646">He found:</text>
        <page num="4253" />
        <text id="2021021647564e07061d4701b0000647">
          <inserted>It seemed to me that there was an ambiguity or an uncertainty about what was agreed at the meeting.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="2021021647564e07061d4701b0000648">In 2018, Premier Marshall issued clear instructions to his ministers:</text>
        <text id="2021021647564e07061d4701b0000649">
          <inserted>I have told my ministers that they cannot expect to remain in cabinet if they see nothing, hear nothing and question nothing.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="2021021647564e07061d4701b0000650">
          <inserted>Ministers have to be inquisitive, inquiring and challenging.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="2021021647564e07061d4701b0000651">
          <inserted>Responsibility ends on the minister's desk, not at the departmental door.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="2021021647564e07061d4701b0000652">This independent inquiry clearly states in black and white that Rachel Sanderson failed. This was not just a minor failure. In Paul Rice's own words, it was a significant failure. The Premier has absolutely no choice. If he is to be true to his words in 2018 about ministerial accountability, about inquisitiveness and about taking responsibility, he must immediately sack the Minister for Child Protection.</text>
        <text id="2021021647564e07061d4701b0000653">It is beyond belief that the minister has made repeated public statements that she would be informed about sexual assaults when she never issued those instructions to her department. This minister is clearly out of her depth, and for the sake of children in care, children who need and deserve so much better, who deserve to be kept safe, she must be immediately replaced.</text>
        <text id="2021021647564e07061d4701b0000654">These latest issues come in the wake of a host of other failings in child protection under this minister's watch, failings that this government refused to investigate in the review. In fact, Judge Rice says, 'It is important to note the limitations of this inquiry.' Budget estimates reveal skyrocketing numbers of children in care and 14½ thousand calls to the Child Abuse Report Line unanswered. Instead of doing what she can to prevent family breakdown, the minister has outsourced the Therapeutic Reunification Service. South Australian children in care deserve so much better. This minister has to go for their sake.</text>
        <text id="2021021647564e07061d4701b0000655">Time expired.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>