<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2020-12-03" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3622" />
  <endPage num="3846" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Coronavirus, Parafield Cluster</name>
      <text id="202012038ab8436de619443990000502">
        <heading>Coronavirus, Parafield Cluster</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4841" kind="question">
        <name>Mr PICTON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Kaurna</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-12-03">
            <name>Coronavirus, Parafield Cluster</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-12-03T14:37:59" />
        <text id="202012038ab8436de619443990000503">
          <timeStamp time="2020-12-03T14:37:59" />
          <by role="member" id="4841">Mr PICTON (Kaurna) (14:37):</by>  My question is to the Premier. Does the Premier support the decision that Health made not to provide police with evidence, the contact tracing information, regarding the 36-year-old man?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-12-03">
            <name>Coronavirus, Parafield Cluster</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-12-03T14:38:11" />
        <text id="202012038ab8436de619443990000504">
          <timeStamp time="2020-12-03T14:38:11" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL (Dunstan—Premier) (14:38):</by>  I have made my position on this abundantly clear, both in press conferences and in this house before. I think there need to be consequences for those people who do the wrong thing and provide incorrect, false and misleading information to contact tracers. But I also appreciate the position that has been taken by public health. They believe unequivocally that, if they start to hand over information, this will reduce the likelihood that people will come forward with information.</text>
        <page num="3646" />
        <text id="202012038ab8436de619443990000505">I would stress very clearly in this situation that this was not a matter, and has never been a matter, about somebody providing accurate information that is then handed over to police. From my perspective, from day one, the real issue here has been that somebody came forward and provided false and misleading information to public health administrators. I think this is an extraordinarily dangerous situation because public health have to frame their response to a cluster, to an outbreak, and so it's absolutely crucial, it's vital. Lives will depend on the fact that that information is fulsome and accurate. In this case, it wasn't.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>