<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2020-11-17" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3393" />
  <endPage num="3472" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Coronavirus, Hotel Quarantine</name>
      <text id="202011173f9fc39633fd4e3bb0000351">
        <heading>Coronavirus, Hotel Quarantine</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4841" kind="question">
        <name>Mr PICTON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Kaurna</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-11-17">
            <name>Coronavirus, Hotel Quarantine</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-11-17T14:23:20" />
        <text id="202011173f9fc39633fd4e3bb0000352">
          <timeStamp time="2020-11-17T14:23:20" />
          <by role="member" id="4841">Mr PICTON (Kaurna) (14:23):</by>  Supplementary: is there currently an investigation underway, as the health minister said, or will there be an investigation after this outbreak is dealt with, as you have told the house today?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-11-17">
            <name>Coronavirus, Hotel Quarantine</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-11-17T14:23:33" />
        <page num="3421" />
        <text id="202011173f9fc39633fd4e3bb0000353">
          <timeStamp time="2020-11-17T14:23:33" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL (Dunstan—Premier) (14:23):</by>  I think I have made this reasonably clear, but on every single infection that comes through we do a review of the likely source of that infection. That happens as an ordinary course: we try to work out the epidemiology of the infection. Of course, that is already happening. In addition to that, with regard to the broader question and the operation of hotel quarantine, I would expect that there will be a further broader investigation into what occurred at Peppers because we are really concerned that, if there is a surface transmission potential in South Australia, this would be, if you like, a first for our state that I'm aware of. I think it is of great concern, and it might mean that there need to be further changes. We have already enacted some changes with regard to our protocols within the quarantine hotels.</text>
        <text id="202011173f9fc39633fd4e3bb0000354">Previously, we were abiding by the AHPPC advice, which was for no mandatory testing but a mandatory declaration for all people that are working there that they don't have any symptoms. This was identified as best practice. In fact, some jurisdictions have had mandatory testing, and many workers have thought, 'Well, I might be developing symptoms, but I've got a test coming up on Saturday, so I just won't subject myself,' and in the meantime go and spread infection across their workplace or back out into the community.</text>
        <text id="202011173f9fc39633fd4e3bb0000355">So best practice was identified as a declaration on a daily basis that there are no symptoms, and if people did develop symptoms while they were at work they were immediately isolated. Their PCR test would be administered by SA Health and they would wait in isolation until they got that test result. That has served Australia extraordinarily well, and I think it is acknowledged as best practice. The difference with this case is that the three people who became infected at Peppers did not have symptoms, so they quite rightly signed a declaration saying, 'I don't have any symptoms and I can come to work.' It really wasn't until the mother of one of those infected went off to get herself tested that we could get on top of this and identify this as a cluster.</text>
        <text id="202011173f9fc39633fd4e3bb0000356">This is why Professor Nicola Spurrier said she would like to, for this very reason, have belt and braces. She would like to continue with the mandatory declaration on a daily basis and, in addition to that, have a mandatory test on a seven-day basis. You would note, sir, that in New Zealand they have a mandatory test on a 14-day basis, and South Australia now has a mandatory test on a seven-day basis, on a weekly basis. We're the only place in Australia which has this mandatory test. We can't be too careful, especially when we consider that it's very possible and plausible that the person in this case, which was the origin of this infection spread, achieved this infection from a surface.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>