<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2020-11-11" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3209" />
  <endPage num="3306" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Women's and Children's Hospital</name>
      <text id="20201111da35106674eb4478b0000237">
        <heading>Women's and Children's Hospital</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Lee</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-11-11">
            <name>Women's and Children's Hospital</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-11-11T14:42:32" />
        <text id="20201111da35106674eb4478b0000238">
          <timeStamp time="2020-11-11T14:42:32" />
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN (Lee) (14:42):</by>  My question is to the Premier. Can the Premier advise the house how much debt will need to be accrued beyond the $33 billion outlined in yesterday's state budget to fully fund the Women's and Children's Hospital project?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-11-11">
            <name>Women's and Children's Hospital</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-11-11T14:42:45" />
        <text id="20201111da35106674eb4478b0000239">
          <timeStamp time="2020-11-11T14:42:45" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL (Dunstan—Premier) (14:42):</by>  It's another very important project and a very big contrast between what we are offering there and what those opposite promised. Let me refresh the memories of those people here. In 2013, we went out and said that we would be making sure that we had a co-located Women's and Children's Hospital with the new Royal Adelaide Hospital. Those opposite matched that, but then soon after the 2014 election they said, 'No, that's not exactly what we meant. We are going to split the Women's and Children's Hospital into two.'</text>
        <text id="20201111da35106674eb4478b0000240">That's not what the clinicians advised, so what we are doing, by contrast to the advice that they received that informed that decision after the 2014 election and also in contrast to the way that they went about setting up and delivering the new Royal Adelaide Hospital, is that we are listening to clinicians.</text>
        <text id="20201111da35106674eb4478b0000241">There is a lot of detailed work because it is very expensive to the taxpayers if you get this wrong. If we need to have a case study on that, just take a look at the Royal Adelaide Hospital. We have had to spend an extraordinary sum of money, which should be outlined in this chamber at some point, fixing the problems associated with the new Royal Adelaide Hospital. Now we've got the new Royal Adelaide Hospital, so that is there. What we don't want to do is repeat the problems and the significantly high cost problems that the previous government had with the new Royal Adelaide Hospital with the new Women's and Children's Hospital, so we are sitting down and we are doing that detailed work.</text>
        <text id="20201111da35106674eb4478b0000242">You would have seen, sir, in the budget that was delivered a further increase in the budget for the Women's and Children's Hospital. That won't be the total budget. We want to make sure that we get a world-class facility here in South Australia, so it won't be the total budget but we have made sure that over the forward estimates we have fully provided for what we believe will be the very best outcome for women and children in South Australia.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>