<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2020-09-22" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2587" />
  <endPage num="2664" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Fuel Price Monitoring</name>
      <text id="20200922788c57c9f5394babb0000687">
        <heading>Fuel Price Monitoring</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="543" kind="question">
        <name>Ms BEDFORD</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Florey</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-09-22">
            <name>Fuel Price Monitoring</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-09-22T15:04:45" />
        <text id="20200922788c57c9f5394babb0000688">
          <timeStamp time="2020-09-22T15:04:45" />
          <by role="member" id="543">Ms BEDFORD (Florey) (15:04):</by>  Could I just ask a supplementary, sir. Of the issues that were raised with the ACCC, were they not significant? Can you elaborate on what those concerns were about the provider that you are considering to use?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. V.A. CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning and Local Government</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-09-22">
            <name>Fuel Price Monitoring</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-09-22T15:05:03" />
        <text id="20200922788c57c9f5394babb0000689">
          <timeStamp time="2020-09-22T15:05:03" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">The Hon. V.A. CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Planning and Local Government) (15:05):</by>  No, I won't go into the detail of it. I didn't assert that they weren't significant. In fact, I think the company in question, which the Labor government in Queensland had appointed to undertake their project, had been criticised, if I can put it best as that, by the ACCC. They gave an undertaking, as I understand it, to provide data as an obligation in negotiated arrangements with the ACCC.</text>
        <text id="20200922788c57c9f5394babb0000690">But the detail of that, no, I don't think I can add anything further, other than to say that, whilst there had been rather scathing comment made during our debates in relation to this particular company, it was the commissioner's view, and indeed my view, that it was even more important that there be an open tender in relation to the data providers, although I understand that there are not many in Australia who undertake this role.</text>
        <text id="20200922788c57c9f5394babb0000691">The company the Queensland government went with was one that had been the subject of some criticism in our debates. I am not suggesting for one moment that that was insignificant. I simply make the point that as a government, and consistent with the commissioner's advice, it was very important to progress to a full tender, and that's exactly what is happening. His advice to me is that they expect to have a finalised position for appointment on that before Christmas.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>