<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2020-09-10" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2511" />
  <endPage num="2585" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Keolis Downer</name>
      <text id="202009103dc5acc247ee42ff80000541">
        <heading>Keolis Downer</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">West Torrens</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-09-10">
            <name>Keolis Downer</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-09-10T15:37:57" />
        <text id="202009103dc5acc247ee42ff80000542">
          <timeStamp time="2020-09-10T15:37:57" />
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS (West Torrens) (15:37):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Infrastructure and Transport. Has his department ever encouraged Keolis Downer to remain in the tender process for the training contract?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4843" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. C.L. WINGARD</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Gibson</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Infrastructure and Transport</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Recreation</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-09-10">
            <name>Keolis Downer</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-09-10T15:38:07" />
        <text id="202009103dc5acc247ee42ff80000543">
          <timeStamp time="2020-09-10T15:38:07" />
          <by role="member" id="4843">The Hon. C.L. WINGARD (Gibson—Minister for Infrastructure and Transport, Minister for Recreation, Sport and Racing) (15:38):</by>  I don't have that information; I'm happy to take it on notice. But I will turn back again to the point, Mr Speaker, in this conversation around outsourced contracts and draw your attention again, draw the house's attention again, to the two-faced approach from the Labor Party. When they are in government they turn around and they sign outsourced contracts. Now—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="202009103dc5acc247ee42ff80000544">
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN:</by>  Point of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="202009103dc5acc247ee42ff80000545">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The minister will resume his seat. The member for Lee on a point of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="202009103dc5acc247ee42ff80000546">
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN:</by>  Only moments ago, in the previous question, you were in receipt of a point of order for debate under standing order 98, and now we see the minister behaving again contrary to your ruling.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="202009103dc5acc247ee42ff80000547">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I note the point of order. I also note the use of the expression 'two-faced'. No-one has taken exception to that particularly. I would ask the minister to consider his language, but otherwise I note the point of order. I will give the minister an opportunity to conclude his response. I think the minister is finished. The member for West Torrens.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>