<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2020-09-09" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2407" />
  <endPage num="2509" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Economic Stimulus Package</name>
      <text id="202009095f6793c2f84a4f0ba0000553">
        <heading>Economic Stimulus Package</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5572" kind="question">
        <name>Ms MICHAELS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-09-09">
            <name>Economic Stimulus Package</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-09-09T14:43:21" />
        <text id="202009095f6793c2f84a4f0ba0000554">
          <timeStamp time="2020-09-09T14:43:21" />
          <by role="member" id="5572">Ms MICHAELS (Enfield) (14:43):</by>  My question is to the Premier. Specifically in relation to small business support, why has the Premier not provided greater and more urgent stimulus for small businesses in South Australia, given the extreme economic impact of COVID?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4342">
        <name>The Hon. D.C. VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="202009095f6793c2f84a4f0ba0000555">
          <by role="member" id="4342">The Hon. D.C. VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN:</by>  Point of order: standing order 97, sir. The question is out of order; it contains two lots of argument.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="202009095f6793c2f84a4f0ba0000556">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The Minister for Energy has a point of order. I might say, member for Enfield, I would benefit from hearing the question once again, and you may care to couch it in terms that might bring it into order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5572" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>Ms MICHAELS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="202009095f6793c2f84a4f0ba0000557">
          <by role="member" id="5572">Ms MICHAELS:</by>  My question is again to the Premier. Why has the Premier not provided greater and more urgent stimulus to South Australian small businesses?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="202009095f6793c2f84a4f0ba0000558">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I anticipate the point of order. It is a good point of order: the question is out of order.</text>
        <text id="202009095f6793c2f84a4f0ba0000559">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="202009095f6793c2f84a4f0ba0000560">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Order! The question from the member for Enfield included argument. I gave the member for Enfield an opportunity to ask the question again. It continued to include argument and it is out of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4841">
        <name>Mr PICTON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="202009095f6793c2f84a4f0ba0000561">
          <by role="member" id="4841">Mr PICTON:</by>  Point of order, Mr Speaker: there was no argument in that question. Asking a question is appropriate and I ask you to clarify where you believe the argument was in that question.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="202009095f6793c2f84a4f0ba0000562">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I have ruled in relation to the question. I will go to—</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>