<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2020-07-21" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2015" />
  <endPage num="2116" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Compulsory Land Acquisition</name>
      <text id="2020072187acf68db008490a90000625">
        <heading>Compulsory Land Acquisition</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="543" kind="question">
        <name>Ms BEDFORD</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Florey</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-07-21">
            <name>Compulsory Land Acquisition</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-07-21T15:14:21" />
        <text id="2020072187acf68db008490a90000626">
          <timeStamp time="2020-07-21T15:14:21" />
          <by role="member" id="543">Ms BEDFORD (Florey) (15:14):</by>  Supplementary, Mr Speaker.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2020072187acf68db008490a90000627">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  With all respect, member for Florey, I think I am going to call the member—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="543" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>Ms BEDFORD</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2020072187acf68db008490a90000628">
          <by role="member" id="543">Ms BEDFORD:</by>  Last question time you owed me a question.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2020072187acf68db008490a90000629">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I did, actually. Member for Florey, then the member for West Torrens if we have time.</text>
        <text id="2020072187acf68db008490a90000630">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="2056" />
        <text id="2020072187acf68db008490a90000631">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I did.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="543" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>Ms BEDFORD</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2020072187acf68db008490a90000632">
          <by role="member" id="543">Ms BEDFORD:</by>  I hate to have to pull rank, although he is my contemporary. How does the conduct of the department in evicting Mr Lam and Ms Loo accord with the avowed policy of successive governments to act as a model litigant, and would this happen if this were a member of your family?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4847" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.K. KNOLL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Schubert</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Transport</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2020-07-21T15:14:51" />
        <text id="2020072187acf68db008490a90000633">
          <timeStamp time="2020-07-21T15:14:51" />
          <by role="member" id="4847">The Hon. S.K. KNOLL (Schubert—Minister for Transport, Infrastructure and Local Government, Minister for Planning) (15:14):</by>  I thank the member for Florey for her question and reject the premise of the question that the government hasn't acted as a model litigant in this circumstance. We have sought to give us much time as possible to help people make arrangements, including contacting them as soon as the project was announced, which was, from memory, earlier last year—March, April, May, somewhere around there. I know that there was further contact made in October, and I know that there has been a series of contacts made over the course of time until now.</text>
        <text id="2020072187acf68db008490a90000634">So this is something that we have been working on with potentially affected residents for over a year. We have, as I understand it, also given extensions of time because COVID-19 had interrupted, especially in the earlier stages, the opportunity for people to be able to purchase other properties. We did see open inspections close for a period of time. That situation has now passed. We have done everything we can to deal with this as sensitively as possible, understanding that there are some people who still consider this to be an imposition that is unfairly put upon them.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>