<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2020-06-30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1737" />
  <endPage num="1856" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Bus Services</name>
      <text id="2020063077601afd754349bfa0000681">
        <heading>Bus Services</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="543" kind="question">
        <name>Ms BEDFORD</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Florey</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-06-30">
            <name>Bus Services</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-06-30T15:24:24" />
        <text id="2020063077601afd754349bfa0000682">
          <timeStamp time="2020-06-30T15:24:24" />
          <by role="member" id="543">Ms BEDFORD (Florey) (15:24):</by>  Supplementary: while I am really tempted to ask what your definition of a monopoly is, I have a question relating to another aspect. In providing tenders to the government, did Torrens Transit make any suggestions in relation to the alteration or closure of bus routes, removal of bus stops or bus service levels, and was this considered in any way in relation to the assessment of those tenders?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4847" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.K. KNOLL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Schubert</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Transport</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-06-30">
            <name>Bus Services</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-06-30T15:24:48" />
        <page num="1779" />
        <text id="2020063077601afd754349bfa0000683">
          <timeStamp time="2020-06-30T15:24:48" />
          <by role="member" id="4847">The Hon. S.K. KNOLL (Schubert—Minister for Transport, Infrastructure and Local Government, Minister for Planning) (15:24):</by>  Again, I thank the member for Florey for her question and do say that it is quite a pertinent and important question. We did ask through the procurement process for the various operators to provide scenarios of different networks. There were two scenarios that were put through to the final procurement phase, and we used that procurement phase to essentially use the operators' knowledge of the network to provide potential network redesign as part of the procurement process.</text>
        <text id="2020063077601afd754349bfa0000684">They were asked to tender on both, essentially to tender on the existing network and then to provide an answer to what an enhanced network could look like. Those did form part of the tender process, but both of those scenarios were tested and I have every confidence that the procurement process was done properly and that the outcomes were the right ones.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>