<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2020-06-02" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1263" />
  <endPage num="1335" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>National Disability Insurance Scheme</name>
      <text id="202006029e4907d176a0488880000575">
        <heading>National Disability Insurance Scheme</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4978" kind="question">
        <name>Ms COOK</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Hurtle Vale</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-06-02">
            <name>National Disability Insurance Scheme</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-06-02T14:51:01" />
        <text id="202006029e4907d176a0488880000576">
          <timeStamp time="2020-06-02T14:51:01" />
          <by role="member" id="4978">Ms COOK (Hurtle Vale) (14:51):</by>  My question is for the Premier. Why did the Premier transition from a state-based system to the NDIS if there were gaps?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4847">
        <name>The Hon. S.K. KNOLL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="202006029e4907d176a0488880000577">
          <by role="member" id="4847">The Hon. S.K. KNOLL:</by>  The question contains alleged fact and argument.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="202006029e4907d176a0488880000578">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I have the point of order. I am willing to hear the question, given how it's gone today. Is that the entire question—if there are gaps?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4978" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>Ms COOK</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="202006029e4907d176a0488880000579">
          <by role="member" id="4978">Ms COOK:</by>  Yes.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="202006029e4907d176a0488880000580">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The Premier.</text>
        <text id="202006029e4907d176a0488880000581">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2020-06-02T14:51:34" />
        <text id="202006029e4907d176a0488880000582">
          <timeStamp time="2020-06-02T14:51:34" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL (Dunstan—Premier) (14:51):</by>  Even before that.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="202006029e4907d176a0488880000583">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Members on my right, be quiet.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="202006029e4907d176a0488880000584">
          <by role="member" id="4338">The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL:</by>  I go back to my earlier comments, that the establishment of this reform received bipartisan report. Originally Bill Shorten was the minister responsible—I think it was in the Gillard government—and so the deal was actually signed between a federal Labor government and a state Labor government. Whilst we weren't party to the actual contract or that transition plan, we were certainly supporters of this major reform as we move towards individual funding for those people who are living with a disability.</text>
        <text id="202006029e4907d176a0488880000585">Everybody appreciated that we couldn't just switch off one system one day and switch on a new system the next day, and so what took place was a series of trials across the country. My understanding is that in South Australia we particularly dealt with transitioning younger people with a disability, and that trial in South Australia took place between 2013 and 2015. Certainly in 2015 we were in that position, and then ultimately the major transfer occurred in late 2018.</text>
        <page num="1299" />
        <text continued="true" id="202006029e4907d176a0488880000586">This is a massive, massive upheaval. The federal government established a new federal agency, the Quality and Safeguards Commission, to oversee those people who were living under the National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA). We still retained some people in South Australia—those people who were living in some supported accommodation in South Australia, particularly in group homes, as well as those people who were under a guardianship arrangement with the Public Advocate in South Australia. So there is still somewhat of a mixed system between the states and the commonwealth, but by and large there has been a transfer from one jurisdiction to the other.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>