<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2020-05-13" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1117" />
  <endPage num="1193" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Fuel Price Monitoring</name>
      <text id="20200513b24f35f0256241eb80000507">
        <heading>Fuel Price Monitoring</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="543" kind="question">
        <name>Ms BEDFORD</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Florey</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-05-13">
            <name>Fuel Price Monitoring</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-05-13T14:41:16" />
        <text id="20200513b24f35f0256241eb80000508">
          <timeStamp time="2020-05-13T14:41:16" />
          <by role="member" id="543">Ms BEDFORD (Florey) (14:41):</by>  Supplementary: just before I do that, I should remind the Attorney-General that there were no recommendations from the report. My question is: why does the Attorney-General believe compliance costs of a 24-hour price guarantee will be higher, given that the Productivity Commission states estimates provided by retailers are, and I quote, 'inherently imprecise and need to be treated with caution'?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. V.A. CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-05-13">
            <name>Fuel Price Monitoring</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-05-13T14:41:40" />
        <text id="20200513b24f35f0256241eb80000509">
          <timeStamp time="2020-05-13T14:41:40" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">The Hon. V.A. CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General) (14:41):</by>  They are all perfectly valid comments in the context of which they are in the report. I'm sorry if I have not recorded it as options 1 and 2, rather than recommendations 1 and 2. For members' benefit, I am referring to the options that have been identified by the Productivity Commission. We have considered those and we think that as the Queensland Labor government have introduced and persisted with their model it is the one to follow.</text>
        <text id="20200513b24f35f0256241eb80000510">Essentially, it will work on the basis that every retail outlet by the purposes of the proposed legislation will be required to provide to the government the price of their fuel and within 30 minutes of any change of that price. That then becomes in an aggregate. Obviously, it was proposed to go out to tender for an aggregate body, if it is the will of the parliament to pass this legislation. There are a number now operating, including in Queensland, who could tender for that. That data is then in a form that the consumer can be confident is accurate and timely and it's able to be provided for the base of any source, app, website or mechanism consumers then choose. I think, in Queensland at the moment, there are some 11 different apps that are available—processes by which a consumer can seek to have that.</text>
        <text id="20200513b24f35f0256241eb80000511">It's the government's view that, supported by the data and work that has been done by the Productivity Commission, this option will provide an opportunity for cheaper fuel prices, choice to the consumer, and timely and accurate data that they can rely on to go and identify where they can buy fuel anywhere in South Australia—the nearest town, nearest suburb or nearest street—for their benefit.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>