House of Assembly Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2) 54 2 Parliament of South Australia House of Assembly published Question Time Fruit Fly Fruit Fly Ms BEDFORD House of Assembly Florey Fruit Fly Ms BEDFORD (Florey) (14:42): Supplementary: minister, does that mean I should have written to the office of biosecurity rather than you when I drew your attention to my constituent who went to Yamba with a docket? What was different with her docket to the docket where the fine was waived? You have just said a docket fine was waived, so I am not sure how that docket is more superior to my constituent's docket. The Hon. T.J. WHETSTONE House of Assembly Chaffey Minister for Primary Industries and Regional Development Fruit Fly The Hon. T.J. WHETSTONE (Chaffey—Minister for Primary Industries and Regional Development) (14:43): To the member for Florey, I am very happy to look further into that, but the relevant docket would be for the purchase of that fruit— Ms Bedford House of Assembly Ms Bedford: It was. The Hon. T.J. WHETSTONE House of Assembly The Hon. T.J. WHETSTONE: —that was purchased in South Australia. So if the purchase is made in South Australia, with a docket of proof of receipt for that fruit, then it is used as a defence at the border or it is used as a defence at the random roadblock. What I would say is that the biosecurity officers, as I understand it, would wave through any person bringing fruit into South Australia or into the fruit fly free areas of the Riverland with a docket and they would not receive an on-the-spot fine. If they did receive a fine, I am very happy to look at that and sit with you to work a way through that. But I have not heard of any dockets that have been produced and then a fine being issued upon the issue of that receipt. Ms BEDFORD House of Assembly Ms BEDFORD: If I may ask a second supplementary, Mr Speaker— The Speaker House of Assembly The SPEAKER: Final question, member for Florey.