<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2019-12-05" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="9031" />
  <endPage num="9135" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Motions</name>
    <text id="201912055931434336d14151b0000110">
      <heading>Motions</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Planning, Development and Infrastructure Act Regulations</name>
      <text id="201912055931434336d14151b0000111">
        <heading>Planning, Development and Infrastructure Act Regulations</heading>
      </text>
      <text id="201912055931434336d14151b0000112">Private Members Business, Committees and Subordinate Legislation, No. 2, Mr Teague to move:</text>
      <text id="201912055931434336d14151b0000113">
        <inserted>That regulations made under the Planning, Development and Infrastructure Act 2016, entitled Development Assessment, made on 20 June 2019 and laid on the table of this house on 2 July 2019, be disallowed.</inserted>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5381" kind="speech">
        <name>Mr TEAGUE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Heysen</electorate>
        <startTime time="2019-12-05T11:41:15" />
        <page num="9039" />
        <text id="201912055931434336d14151b0000114">
          <timeStamp time="2019-12-05T11:41:15" />
          <by role="member" id="5381">Mr TEAGUE (Heysen) (11:41):</by>  I move:</text>
        <text id="201912055931434336d14151b0000115">
          <inserted>That this order of the day be postponed.</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3123">
        <name>The Hon. A. PICCOLO</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201912055931434336d14151b0000116">
          <by role="member" id="3123">The Hon. A. PICCOLO:</by>  Point of order: my understanding is that this regulation was disallowed in the upper house last night. As such, the regulation does not exist as in the format on the <term>Notice Paper</term>. It would be inappropriate for us to debate a matter that actually does not exist.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3120" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Pederick</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201912055931434336d14151b0000117">
          <by role="member" id="3120">Mr Pederick:</by>  We are not; we are postponing it.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3123">
        <name>The Hon. A. PICCOLO</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201912055931434336d14151b0000118">
          <by role="member" id="3123">The Hon. A. PICCOLO:</by>  Why would you postpone it then? It does not exist.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201912055931434336d14151b0000119">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  We have the point of order.</text>
        <text id="201912055931434336d14151b0000120">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3123">
        <name>The Hon. A. PICCOLO</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201912055931434336d14151b0000121">
          <by role="member" id="3123">The Hon. A. PICCOLO:</by>  Let the Speaker make the ruling.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201912055931434336d14151b0000122">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Yes, we have the point of order. It is on the <term>Notice Paper</term>. I am going to take it in chronological order, but the member for Light does raise a good point. If it is postponed, in any case it will become obsolete anyway. We have the motion to postpone; it has been moved by the member for Heysen. I thank the member for Light.</text>
        <text id="201912055931434336d14151b0000123">Motion carried.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>