<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2019-10-15" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7703" />
  <endPage num="7807" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Estimates Replies</name>
    <text id="20191015cb8d25eb7ff44436a0001553">
      <heading>Estimates Replies</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Conveyance Duty Revenue</name>
      <text id="20191015cb8d25eb7ff44436a0001554">
        <inserted>
          <heading>Conveyance Duty Revenue</heading>
        </inserted>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Lee</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2019-10-15">
            <name>Conveyance Duty Revenue</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20191015cb8d25eb7ff44436a0001555">
          <inserted>In reply to <by role="member" id="4842">the Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN (Lee)</by> (24 July 2019).  (Estimates Committee B)</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Treasurer</electorate>
        <text id="20191015cb8d25eb7ff44436a0001556">
          <inserted>
            <by role="member" id="">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer):</by>  I have been advised the following: </inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20191015cb8d25eb7ff44436a0001557">
          <inserted>Family farm transfers to or from companies, in addition to individuals and trusts, are exempt from stamp duty where all other existing criteria are met. This results in equal treatment of family farm transfers for the purposes of stamp duty, regardless of how a property is held. It also provides greater flexibility for owners of family farms.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20191015cb8d25eb7ff44436a0001558">
          <inserted>The total estimated revenue forgone from the family farm exemption in 2018-19 was around $29.5 million from approximately 430 transactions. It is estimated that company related family farm transfers represented around 25 per cent of these amounts in 2018-19.</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>