<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2019-09-24" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7423" />
  <endPage num="7499" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <text id="20190924c61baa2e8029481880000480">
      <heading>Question Time</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Land Tax</name>
      <text id="20190924c61baa2e8029481880000481">
        <heading>Land Tax</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5084" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MALINAUSKAS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Croydon</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2019-09-24">
            <name>Land Tax</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2019-09-24T14:26:57" />
        <text id="20190924c61baa2e8029481880000482">
          <timeStamp time="2019-09-24T14:26:57" />
          <by role="member" id="5084">Mr MALINAUSKAS (Croydon—Leader of the Opposition) (14:26):</by>  My question is to the Premier. Does the Premier's latest land tax bill provide a tax cut, or is it a revenue raising measure?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2019-09-24">
            <name>Land Tax</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2019-09-24T14:27:07" />
        <text id="20190924c61baa2e8029481880000483">
          <timeStamp time="2019-09-24T14:27:07" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL (Dunstan—Premier) (14:27):</by>  I have explained this in the last answer. This is like a Dorothy Dixer, because every single day that we are talking about our economic reform agenda here in this chamber is a happy day as far as I am concerned. There is $70 million worth of land tax reduction over the next three years, $70 million worth of land tax revenue decrease over this year. Those opposite would hate it because they love taxes. They are addicted to taxes. They like inflicting them on the people who are trying to get ahead—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190924c61baa2e8029481880000484">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Premier, there is a point of order. Premier, be seated. Member for West Torrens, your point of order?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190924c61baa2e8029481880000485">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  That is debate, sir.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190924c61baa2e8029481880000486">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Pretty close to debate, Premier. I ask you to come back to the substance of the question.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190924c61baa2e8029481880000487">
          <by role="member" id="4338">The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL:</by>  Yes, the substance of the question was, of course, about the massive reduction in land tax revenue that will come in. Some governments, maybe of another political persuasion, would hate this because they love taxing. We on this side want to ease that handbrake that those opposite inflicted upon the productive component of our economy for a long period of time.</text>
        <text id="20190924c61baa2e8029481880000488">We make no apologies that this is going to reduce revenue into our state coffers, but what it will simultaneously do is grow the size of our economy, grow investment into our economy, grow investment from South Australians reinvesting here in South Australia and bring investment dollars from interstate and overseas into South Australia. At 3.7 per cent, this is like kryptonite for people wanting to invest in our economy—it is like kryptonite. We are taking it from 3.7 per cent down to 2.4 per cent, and this will reduce revenue. It will reduce revenue in South Australia, but it will stimulate the economy. As you stimulate the economy, you create jobs, and this is exactly and precisely what our focus in government has been.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4841" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Picton</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190924c61baa2e8029481880000489">
          <by role="member" id="4841">Mr Picton:</by>  I think you should stake your leadership on it.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190924c61baa2e8029481880000490">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Kaurna is warned.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190924c61baa2e8029481880000491">
          <by role="member" id="4338">The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL:</by>  We are proud of the job creation that has occurred in South Australia. We now have record employment in South Australia and there is plenty more work to do. There is only one side in this debate that is up for complex reform and that is the government.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>