<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2019-09-12" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7299" />
  <endPage num="7421" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Estimates Replies</name>
    <subject>
      <name>National Park Rangers</name>
      <text id="20190912c609dec13a3b4e6780002171">
        <inserted>
          <heading>National Park Rangers</heading>
        </inserted>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4622" kind="question">
        <name>In reply to Dr CLOSE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Port Adelaide</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2019-09-12">
            <name>National Park Rangers</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20190912c609dec13a3b4e6780002172">
          <inserted>In reply to <by role="member" id="4622">Dr CLOSE (Port Adelaide—Deputy Leader of the Opposition)</by> (30 July 2019).  (Estimates Committee B)</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4837" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. D.J. SPEIRS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Black</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Environment and Water</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2019-09-12">
            <name>National Park Rangers</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20190912c609dec13a3b4e6780002173">
          <inserted>
            <by role="member" id="4837">The Hon. D.J. SPEIRS (Black—Minister for Environment and Water):</by>  I have been advised:</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20190912c609dec13a3b4e6780002174">
          <inserted>The Department for Environment and Water undertook organisational reform earlier this year that included the review of 18 Construction and Maintenance Workers (CMW) positions. </inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20190912c609dec13a3b4e6780002175">
          <inserted>The department went through a thorough assessment process that identified the work undertaken by the 18 CMWs employed at that time. This showed a duplication in work that was undertaken by others in the parks system, including rangers, volunteers, contractors and other staff. </inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20190912c609dec13a3b4e6780002176">
          <inserted>The review identified that employees in eight CMW positions were delivering a work program that aligned with ranger positions in the operational services employment stream. These employees had also attained qualifications and experience, including authorisations under the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972, relevant for a ranger position. Accordingly, these eight employees and their position transitioned from CMW stream to become rangers in the operational services stream.</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>