<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2019-09-10" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7033" />
  <endPage num="7159" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Answers to Questions</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Care and Protection Orders</name>
      <text id="2019091008ad3e0e26a941c2b0001259">
        <inserted>
          <heading>Care and Protection Orders</heading>
        </inserted>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5376" kind="question">
        <name>Ms STINSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Badcoe</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2019-07-03" qonNum="1018">
            <name>Care and Protection Orders</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="2019091008ad3e0e26a941c2b0001260">
          <inserted>1018 <by role="member" id="5376">Ms STINSON (Badcoe)</by> (3 July 2019).  How many applications for a care and protection order sought by the Department for Child Protection were rejected in 2018-19?</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4340" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R. SANDERSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Adelaide</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Child Protection</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2019-07-03" qonNum="1018">
            <name>Care and Protection Orders</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="2019091008ad3e0e26a941c2b0001261">
          <inserted>
            <by role="member" id="4340">The Hon. R. SANDERSON (Adelaide—Minister for Child Protection):</by>  I have been advised:</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="2019091008ad3e0e26a941c2b0001262">
          <inserted>During the 2018-19 financial year, there were no applications for care and protection orders sought by the Department for Child Protection, which were dismissed. An application submitted to the courts can contain multiple care and protection orders, which the department may be seeking. Whilst one or more of the care and protection orders within an application may be dismissed, the application itself progresses to finalisation.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="2019091008ad3e0e26a941c2b0001263">
          <inserted>Of the applications sought by the Department for Child Protection within the 2018-19 financial year, 47 applications had one or more of its care and protection orders dismissed. The majority of the dismissed orders were for parental or child assessments, written undertakings or ancillary orders.</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>