<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2019-09-10" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7033" />
  <endPage num="7159" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Grievance Debate</name>
    <text id="201909109693b7eaf56f4d0390000814">
      <heading>Grievance Debate</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>State Liberal Government</name>
      <text id="201909109693b7eaf56f4d0390000815">
        <heading>State Liberal Government</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5084" kind="speech">
        <name>Mr MALINAUSKAS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Croydon</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2019-09-10T15:13:28" />
        <text id="201909109693b7eaf56f4d0390000816">
          <timeStamp time="2019-09-10T15:13:28" />
          <by role="member" id="5084">Mr MALINAUSKAS (Croydon—Leader of the Opposition) (15:13):</by>  I welcome the opportunity to be able to address the parliament on our first day back after a substantial break because it has been an eventful few weeks, whether the government likes it or not. I do not think there is much dispute in the community that the government is having a pretty rough time of it. It is worth just reflecting on some of the stories that the South Australian community have had to consume since the parliament last met.</text>
        <text id="201909109693b7eaf56f4d0390000817">They have seen their sub jobs that we were promised under attack. They have seen potentially 1,100 jobs being cut from our public hospital system, including nurses and doctors. We see that the government are clearly going to fall well and truly short of their own 20,000 new apprenticeships target. We have seen hospital ramping at the worst levels in decades. We have seen the government announce their intention to privatise the state's own backup generators, and all the while they continue their disastrous train privatisation plans.</text>
        <text id="201909109693b7eaf56f4d0390000818">Concerningly, we have seen very bad economic news, not least of which was that state final demand has contracted—or gone backwards—for two consecutive quarters. According to the Premier, this meets his own test of the state going into recession. Most concerning was the rather solemn news regarding the state's unemployment rate, which came out a few weeks ago.</text>
        <text id="201909109693b7eaf56f4d0390000819">This government has caused a surge in the number of South Australians who are currently unemployed. Today, 13,000 more South Australians are unemployed than at the time of the last state election. An additional 13,000 people are trying to work out how they are going to put food on the table for their families and their children. It is quite a tragic proposition.</text>
        <page num="7077" />
        <text id="201909109693b7eaf56f4d0390000820">The state's unemployment rate is now 6.9 per cent. It is a surge in unemployment. It means that South Australia now has the highest unemployment rate in the commonwealth by some way. That is a real statistic. That is not in dispute. It is not some fabrication; it is a genuine measure of the pain that households in this state are currently feeling. </text>
        <text id="201909109693b7eaf56f4d0390000821">The most alarming thing for me was the response by the Premier when he was asked about that situation. When the Premier was asked whether there was a problem, his response was, 'None whatsoever.' Try telling that to the families who are sitting at home as we speak trying to find a job, trying to work out how they are going to pay the bills and how they are going to make sure their children are provided for when they do not have an income. To them, it is not 'no problem whatsoever': it is a very real problem. If we have a Premier who refuses to acknowledge the problem that exists, then we have a lot of pain coming our way.</text>
        <text id="201909109693b7eaf56f4d0390000822">What South Australians really need is a Premier who not just acknowledges that the problem exists but who is actually willing to do something about it with well thought-out economic policy. This brings me to the land tax measure: the central policy plank for this Premier in the most recent state budget. This is a classic example not of considered policy reform as the Premier would like to have us believe but of policy on the run.</text>
        <text id="201909109693b7eaf56f4d0390000823">There was a land tax announced in last year's state budget that this opposition was willing to see sail through the parliament. That was quickly revised in this year's state budget, approximately nine months later. Here we are, three months after that, with yet another version of a land tax policy. For those families sitting at home who currently do not have jobs, how can they have confidence in the future of this state when they have a Premier who denies that their problem exists? More concerningly, we have a Premier who is making up economic policy as he goes along.</text>
        <text id="201909109693b7eaf56f4d0390000824">We understand that the Premier does not even show up to the budget cabinet committee meetings. We understand that we have a Premier who is completely abdicating his responsibility on economic policy to a Treasurer who, as we understand, is not going to be around in 2½ years. This government is not taking seriously its extraordinary responsibility to the men, women and working families of this state to ensure that they can provide for their families by ensuring there is a cogent, well thought-out, sustainable, long-term economic plan, as distinct from policy on the run which is destined to fail.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>