<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2019-09-10" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7033" />
  <endPage num="7159" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Land Tax</name>
      <page num="7065" />
      <text id="20190910fd3167f3bed1498b80000585">
        <heading>Land Tax</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Lee</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2019-09-10">
            <name>Land Tax</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2019-09-10T14:35:28" />
        <text id="20190910fd3167f3bed1498b80000586">
          <timeStamp time="2019-09-10T14:35:28" />
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN (Lee) (14:35):</by>  My question is to the Premier. Does the Premier agree with his Treasurer that, in retrospect, his land tax policy could not have been handled differently?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343">
        <name>The Hon. J.A.W. GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190910fd3167f3bed1498b80000587">
          <by role="member" id="4343">The Hon. J.A.W. GARDNER:</by>  Point of order, sir: I want to be clear because I think that the member was seeking to put a quote in. It is not clear that he was. If it was a paraphrase, it didn't make sense. Under standing order 97, it does suggest that questions should make some sense.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190910fd3167f3bed1498b80000588">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  That is a bogus point of order. I caught the question.</text>
        <text id="20190910fd3167f3bed1498b80000589">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190910fd3167f3bed1498b80000590">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I will determine whether to kick him out. I understand there were a fair few elements to the question, which is why it could be confusing. However, in terms of the merit of the question, I think the question is within order. I will allow someone to answer. Member for Lee, could we have the question again? Thank you.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190910fd3167f3bed1498b80000591">
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN:</by>  Thank you, Mr Speaker. My question is to the Premier. Does the Premier agree with his Treasurer that, in retrospect, his land tax policy could not have been handled differently?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190910fd3167f3bed1498b80000592">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I am going to allow that question. Would someone like to answer it?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2019-09-10T14:36:36" />
        <text id="20190910fd3167f3bed1498b80000593">
          <timeStamp time="2019-09-10T14:36:36" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL (Dunstan—Premier) (14:36):</by>  I haven't heard those comments by the Treasurer, but we do accept, as we have stated for a long period of time, that we were not prepared to put the changes through on 1 July because they were complex changes and they required additional work. That is why we said immediately after announcing our position that we would listen to the people of South Australia, who would talk about specific issues with relation to landownership and the levying of land tax. That is precisely what we have done.</text>
        <text id="20190910fd3167f3bed1498b80000594">We were not in a position on budget day to stick through something on 1 July this year, but we have done the work—the hard work, the grunt work—listening to people. For some reason those opposite are complaining now about a $70 million reduction in land tax.</text>
        <text id="20190910fd3167f3bed1498b80000595">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. Mullighan interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190910fd3167f3bed1498b80000596">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Lee is called to order and warned.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190910fd3167f3bed1498b80000597">
          <by role="member" id="4338">The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL:</by>  I suppose in many ways what it does—</text>
        <text id="20190910fd3167f3bed1498b80000598">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5387">Mr Brown interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190910fd3167f3bed1498b80000599">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Playford is warned.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190910fd3167f3bed1498b80000600">
          <by role="member" id="4338">The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL:</by>  —is it highlights where we were—currently where we are, of course, because we are still under the old regime—and where we are going. Let me tell you a little bit about that.</text>
        <text id="20190910fd3167f3bed1498b80000601">The land tax rate that we inherited from those opposite at the top marginal rate was 3.7 per cent. How does that compare with the rest of the country? Well, it's a lot higher than New South Wales, at 2 per cent; it's a lot higher than Victoria, at 2.25 per cent; it's a lot higher than Western Australia, at 2.67 per cent; and it's a lot higher than Queensland, at 2.75 per cent, and that's precisely why we listened to people. Not everybody agreed with aggregation. Let's be clear: not everybody agreed with aggregation.</text>
        <text id="20190910fd3167f3bed1498b80000602">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190910fd3167f3bed1498b80000603">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Order! Members on my left, be quiet.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190910fd3167f3bed1498b80000604">
          <by role="member" id="4338">The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL:</by>  What people did say was that we want an overall lower land tax in South Australia, that we want a fairer system in South Australia. If you are going to introduce aggregation, you better do something about the threshold and you better do something about the top land tax marginal rates in South Australia and make them more attractive to bring investment dollars into South Australia.</text>
        <page num="7066" />
        <text id="20190910fd3167f3bed1498b80000605">A rate of 3.7 per cent was unsustainable. On the day of the budget we said that we would bring that rate down, from 3.7 per cent to 2.9 per cent, over a period of time. But we also said—and we were very clear about this—that if there was evidence that was presented to us that would show that we would bring in more money, then we would accelerate that rate reduction. That is exactly what we said we were going to do and that is precisely what we have done.</text>
        <text id="20190910fd3167f3bed1498b80000606">Where we have landed is 2.4 per cent. Yes, we are still above New South Wales and Victoria, but we are below Western Australia and we are below Queensland. We are at the national average, and we would like to go further. We would like it to go further because we are the party that stands for lower taxes in South Australia.</text>
        <text id="20190910fd3167f3bed1498b80000607">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190910fd3167f3bed1498b80000608">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER</by>:  Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190910fd3167f3bed1498b80000609">
          <by role="member" id="4338">The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL:</by>  For some reason those opposite are—</text>
        <text id="20190910fd3167f3bed1498b80000610">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5376">Ms Stinson interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190910fd3167f3bed1498b80000611">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Badcoe is on two warnings.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190910fd3167f3bed1498b80000612">
          <by role="member" id="4338">The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL:</by>  For some reason those opposite are now advocating that we should stop any land tax relief, because this is directly to their narrative over the last 100 years of their political party being in existence. They love taxing people because they believe—</text>
        <text id="20190910fd3167f3bed1498b80000613">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190910fd3167f3bed1498b80000614">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER</by>:  Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190910fd3167f3bed1498b80000615">
          <by role="member" id="4338">The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL:</by>  They believe they are the best people to spend our money. I don't think there is anybody in South Australia who thinks they are the best people to spend the people of South Australia's money.</text>
        <text id="20190910fd3167f3bed1498b80000616">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. Mullighan interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190910fd3167f3bed1498b80000617">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Lee is warned for a second time.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190910fd3167f3bed1498b80000618">
          <by role="member" id="4338">The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL:</by>  That is why you are not in government. We were elected to get this state moving in the right direction.</text>
        <text id="20190910fd3167f3bed1498b80000619">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190910fd3167f3bed1498b80000620">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER</by>:  Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190910fd3167f3bed1498b80000621">
          <by role="member" id="4338">The Hon. S.S. MARSHALL:</by>  We were elected to reform this state and move us in a direction that will keep our next generation in South Australia. We believe we have the balance of this legislation right. It is out for consultation until 2 October and we hope to have that legislation before the parliament on 15 October.</text>
        <text id="20190910fd3167f3bed1498b80000622">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190910fd3167f3bed1498b80000623">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Badcoe can leave for 20 minutes.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5376">
        <name>Ms STINSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190910fd3167f3bed1498b80000624">
          <by role="member" id="5376">Ms STINSON:</by>  Thank you, sir.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190910fd3167f3bed1498b80000625">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  You're welcome. When she does, the member for Lee can have another question and then we will go to the member for King.</text>
        <text id="20190910fd3167f3bed1498b80000626">
          <event>The honourable member for Badcoe having withdrawn from the chamber:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>