<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2019-09-10" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7033" />
  <endPage num="7159" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Answers to Questions</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Probity Checks</name>
      <text id="20190910b67db92e1e8d41b2a0001671">
        <inserted>
          <heading>Probity Checks</heading>
        </inserted>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4335" kind="question">
        <name>Mr ODENWALDER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Elizabeth</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2019-09-11" qonNum="1139">
            <name>Probity Checks</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20190910b67db92e1e8d41b2a0001672">
          <inserted>1139 <by role="member" id="4335">Mr ODENWALDER (Elizabeth)</by> (11 September 2019).  How many probity check applications were there in 2018-19 and do you expect demand to remain steady over the forward estimates?</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4843" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. C.L. WINGARD</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Gibson</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Police</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Recreation</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2019-09-11" qonNum="1139">
            <name>Probity Checks</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20190910b67db92e1e8d41b2a0001673">
          <inserted>
            <by role="member" id="4843">The Hon. C.L. WINGARD (Gibson—Minister for Police, Emergency Services and Correctional Services, Minister for Recreation, Sport and Racing):</by>  During 2018-19 the Licensing Enforcement Branch (LEB) performed 5,928 probity investigations for CBS administered industries.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20190910b67db92e1e8d41b2a0001674">
          <inserted>The number of probity investigations undertaken by LEB for CBS has remained relatively consistent over several years and this pattern is expected to continue in the future.</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>