<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2019-06-18" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6267" />
  <endPage num="6321" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Exceptional Resource Funding</name>
      <text id="2019061880492e76823b473580000301">
        <heading>Exceptional Resource Funding</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4622" kind="question">
        <name>Dr CLOSE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Port Adelaide</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2019-06-18">
            <name>Exceptional Resource Funding</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2019-06-18T14:14:35" />
        <text id="2019061880492e76823b473580000302">
          <timeStamp time="2019-06-18T14:14:35" />
          <by role="member" id="4622">Dr CLOSE (Port Adelaide—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:14):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Child Protection. Did the minister tell a journalist in January this year that the resources funding applications from foster and kinship carers were still being assessed on a case-by-case basis?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4340" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R. SANDERSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Adelaide</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Child Protection</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2019-06-18">
            <name>Exceptional Resource Funding</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2019-06-18T14:14:51" />
        <text id="2019061880492e76823b473580000303">
          <timeStamp time="2019-06-18T14:14:51" />
          <by role="member" id="4340">The Hon. R. SANDERSON (Adelaide—Minister for Child Protection) (14:14):</by>  I don't recall the exact date of whatever you are referring to but, as far as I am aware, as I have mentioned in my very full answer in relation to the Treasurer's direction No. 2, which hasn't changed from 2016 under the Labor government, it is important for each department to reflect on all their policies and procedures to see that they are adequately and correctly spending the money. At no time was I aware that funding would be stopped or denied. I was told always that it would be on an individual case-by-case basis, as it always had been.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>