<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2019-05-01" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5541" />
  <endPage num="5629" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Labour Hire Practices</name>
      <page num="5583" />
      <text id="20190501a0b270d557764eac90000625">
        <heading>Labour Hire Practices</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5571" kind="question">
        <name>Mr SZAKACS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2019-05-01">
            <name>Labour Hire Practices</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2019-05-01T14:59:19" />
        <text id="20190501a0b270d557764eac90000626">
          <timeStamp time="2019-05-01T14:59:19" />
          <by role="member" id="5571">Mr SZAKACS (Cheltenham) (14:59):</by>  My question is to the Attorney-General. Is the Attorney-General aware that Commissioner Dini Soulio says that he will start enforcing South Australia's labour hire laws from 1 June 2019, and will the Attorney-General now commit to not blocking the commissioner from enforcing these laws?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. V.A. CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2019-05-01">
            <name>Labour Hire Practices</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2019-05-01T14:59:36" />
        <text id="20190501a0b270d557764eac90000627">
          <timeStamp time="2019-05-01T14:59:36" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">The Hon. V.A. CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General) (14:59):</by>  Let's be very clear about this. I have read the evidence of Mr Soulio. Mr Soulio has made it very clear in his evidence to the committee and this parliament that he hasn't been directed by me, or even asked by me, not to progress the matter, so to repeat that assertion is quite wrong.</text>
        <text id="20190501a0b270d557764eac90000628">His evidence is very clear: he is an independent commissioner, and he explained to the committee why he decided that he would not progress that and, in particular, relates to matters such as, in the event of there being any repeal of that legislation, the expense and unnecessary training it might have put to persons who may have felt that they were liable to obligations under that legislation. He explained all that to the committee.</text>
        <text id="20190501a0b270d557764eac90000629">He confirmed that he had no request or direction from me or, as best I understand it, anyone else in government. He is an independent person in that regard. Yes, he did give evidence that, in the event that there is no repeal of the legislation, he would continue to look at the progress of that matter. But the legislation is yet to be debated in the other place for the purposes of dealing with the matter, so I would invite the member to be aware of the importance of not reflecting on matters that are before the house in relation to legislation. In relation to—</text>
        <text id="20190501a0b270d557764eac90000630">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190501a0b270d557764eac90000631">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER</by>:  Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. V.A. CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190501a0b270d557764eac90000632">
          <by role="member" id="1804">The Hon. V.A. CHAPMAN:</by>  —the statements, as previously indicated, I fully stand by them. In relation to Mr Soulio's action as an independent commissioner, I have noted them and fully respect them.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>