<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2019-05-01" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5541" />
  <endPage num="5629" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Keogh Case</name>
      <page num="5579" />
      <text id="20190501b99e005e0a124a6d90000552">
        <heading>Keogh Case</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">West Torrens</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2019-05-01">
            <name>Keogh Case</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2019-05-01T14:44:49" />
        <text id="20190501b99e005e0a124a6d90000553">
          <timeStamp time="2019-05-01T14:44:49" />
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS (West Torrens) (14:44):</by>  My question is to the Attorney-General. Does the Attorney-General agree with former solicitor-general Chris Kourakis in his conclusions that the defence theory promoted by Dr Moles that Anna-Jane Cheney died of an allergic reaction to Naprosyn found at the home at the time of death was without any basis and that forensic tests found no traces of the drug in Anna-Jane's body?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343">
        <name>The Hon. J.A.W. GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190501b99e005e0a124a6d90000554">
          <by role="member" id="4343">The Hon. J.A.W. GARDNER:</by>  Point of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190501b99e005e0a124a6d90000555">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I have the point of order, I believe. It is about introducing facts. If the member for West Torrens had asked whether the Attorney had agreed with the conclusion, that might be okay, but he then continued to elaborate on that extensively, which does arguably breach standing order 97: that a member may not offer any facts except by leave of the house. I have allowed the member some scope here. I ask him either to amend the question or I will switch to the other side and come back to him. This would, of course, go away if leave was allowed.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190501b99e005e0a124a6d90000556">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  Indeed, sir. My question is to the Attorney-General. Does the Attorney-General agree with the former solicitor-general's advice that a proposition promoted by Henry Keogh that he must be acquitted if Anna-Jane Cheney did not drown, as described by Manock, was silly?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343">
        <name>The Hon. J.A.W. GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190501b99e005e0a124a6d90000557">
          <by role="member" id="4343">The Hon. J.A.W. GARDNER:</by>  Point of order.</text>
        <text id="20190501b99e005e0a124a6d90000558">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190501b99e005e0a124a6d90000559">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343">
        <name>The Hon. J.A.W. GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190501b99e005e0a124a6d90000560">
          <by role="member" id="4343">The Hon. J.A.W. GARDNER:</by>  In continuing to characterise what the advice is without quoting, the member is in breach of the standing order continually.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190501b99e005e0a124a6d90000561">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I uphold the point of order, and I ask members to consider whether they might consider allowing leave if it was in fact asked for in the future. I will switch to my right and come back to the member. The member for Narungga.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>