<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2019-02-28" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4877" />
  <endPage num="4952" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>School Zoning</name>
      <text id="20190228cf11d72b16494ba890000526">
        <heading>School Zoning</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4622" kind="question">
        <name>Dr CLOSE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Port Adelaide</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2019-02-28">
            <name>School Zoning</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2019-02-28T14:25:06" />
        <text id="20190228cf11d72b16494ba890000527">
          <timeStamp time="2019-02-28T14:25:06" />
          <by role="member" id="4622">Dr CLOSE (Port Adelaide—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:25):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Education. Will the minister now apologise for the impact on families in the suburbs cut out of the Adelaide high schools' zone?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.A.W. GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Morialta</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Education</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2019-02-28">
            <name>School Zoning</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2019-02-28T14:25:17" />
        <text id="20190228cf11d72b16494ba890000528">
          <timeStamp time="2019-02-28T14:25:17" />
          <by role="member" id="4343">The Hon. J.A.W. GARDNER (Morialta—Minister for Education) (14:25):</by>  I thank the member for the question. The fact is that I am very sorry that there has been disruption in a number of families' lives and their expectation that had built up that next year they would be attending a certain school. That is why the education department is ensuring that officers are available to give case management support to all those families to ensure that they are aware of their options and opportunities across our government system.</text>
        <text id="20190228cf11d72b16494ba890000529">The other point I make to all those families is that we take very seriously our responsibility to ensure that whichever school their child is at, that child will be supported to reach their potential, whether their potential is that they want to go on an academic pathway or on a pathway towards an apprenticeship or a traineeship, or if they have a sporting preference or a languages preference or whatever special entry program they might prefer, whether they want to attend their local zoned school or one of our other outstanding local public schools that has the capacity for that student.</text>
        <text id="20190228cf11d72b16494ba890000530">When I say that, it's in the full knowledge that those opposite would have been confronted with a very difficult decision had they remained in power on 17 March last year. They would have been in a situation—</text>
        <text id="20190228cf11d72b16494ba890000531">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. Mullighan interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190228cf11d72b16494ba890000532">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Member for Lee!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.A.W. GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190228cf11d72b16494ba890000533">
          <by role="member" id="4343">The Hon. J.A.W. GARDNER:</by>  —where the infrastructure provided by those opposite, together with the decisions that those opposite had made in terms of expanding the school zone, would have left us in a situation where—yes, this year Adelaide High is slightly over capacity—next year it would have been massively over capacity and the year after that more over capacity. The question has to be asked: would those opposite have been cancelling those special entry programs? Would those opposite have been cancelling the zone, or would those opposite have been preferring to rack, pack and stack students into classrooms—</text>
        <text id="20190228cf11d72b16494ba890000534">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. Koutsantonis interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="4910" />
        <text id="20190228cf11d72b16494ba890000535">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Order, member for West Torrens!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.A.W. GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190228cf11d72b16494ba890000536">
          <by role="member" id="4343">The Hon. J.A.W. GARDNER:</by>  —into which they don't fit, into corridors, setting up tents on the Parklands? What other process do those opposite suggest would be appropriate? Yes, it's a challenging situation, and I appreciate it's particularly challenging for those families who had made plans for next year. That's why we are putting in place the case management support. Those opposite can help to alleviate some of the challenges in this situation by reassuring those families because they know that these are good schools that are now in the zone. They know that the other neighbouring schools have an outstanding—</text>
        <text id="20190228cf11d72b16494ba890000537">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190228cf11d72b16494ba890000538">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER</by>:  Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.A.W. GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190228cf11d72b16494ba890000539">
          <by role="member" id="4343">The Hon. J.A.W. GARDNER:</by>  —opportunity at any of the schools that they are able to go to, but it is not possible to fit 1,800 or 2,400, or even 1,600 students into a school—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5376" kind="interjection">
        <name>Ms Stinson</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190228cf11d72b16494ba890000540">
          <by role="member" id="5376">Ms Stinson:</by>  Well, why did you promise you could?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190228cf11d72b16494ba890000541">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Badcoe is warned for a second and final time.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.A.W. GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190228cf11d72b16494ba890000542">
          <by role="member" id="4343">The Hon. J.A.W. GARDNER:</by>  —that is not built for it. That is what those opposite would have had us do. We know that it is a challenging situation for those families, but it is not this government that made those promises in 2013. We had—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4340" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. R. Sanderson</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190228cf11d72b16494ba890000543">
          <by role="member" id="4340">The Hon. R. Sanderson:</by>  Unsustainable, never possible.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190228cf11d72b16494ba890000544">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The Minister for Child Protection is called to order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.A.W. GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190228cf11d72b16494ba890000545">
          <by role="member" id="4343">The Hon. J.A.W. GARDNER:</by>  —every expectation when we came to government that if such a situation were to be confronting us, those opposite, in the 16 years they had, in the five years since they have been planning the zone change, might have done a little bit of the work on the demographics, the challenges and the capacity pressures facing the system. It is quite clear that they did not because—</text>
        <text id="20190228cf11d72b16494ba890000546">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="5084">Mr Malinauskas interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190228cf11d72b16494ba890000547">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The Leader of the Opposition is called to order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.A.W. GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20190228cf11d72b16494ba890000548">
          <by role="member" id="4343">The Hon. J.A.W. GARDNER:</by>  —the Leader of the Opposition says, 'That's why we built a new school.' They built a new school and expanded the zone to include a range of students who would have overcome the capacity of the new school. That is the advice that we have from the education department. If those opposite are saying that if they were in government they would have cancelled the special interest programs, or if indeed that's what they are encouraging us to now do, then let them say so—because that's the choice.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>